CVE-2025-3406
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in Nothings stb up to f056911. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is the function stbhw_build_tileset_from_image of the component Header Array Handler. The manipulation of the argument w leads to out-of-bounds read. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOut-of-bounds read vulnerability in stb library's stbhw_build_tileset_from_image function within the Header Array Handler component. The manipulation of the width argument 'w' allows reading memory outside allocated boundaries, potentially leading to information disclosure or unpredictable behavior. This is a memory safety flaw in a widely-used image processing library.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.13CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate stb_image.h in your codebaseSearch your project files for 'stb_image.h' and note its file path. Also check any package manager dependencies (conan, vcpkg, apt, etc.) that may include stb.Affected if The file is present and is version 2.13 or earlier, or the version cannot be determined and is assumed to be <= 2.13
-
Identify the stb library versionOpen stb_image.h and search for a version string near the top of the file, typically in a comment like '#define STB_IMAGE_VERSION' or similar version macros. Compare against the affected range <= 2.13.Affected if The version is 2.13 or any version lower than 2.13, or no version is defined (older release)
-
Check for usage of stbhw_build_tileset_from_imageSearch your codebase for calls to the function 'stbhw_build_tileset_from_image'. This function is part of the stb_write (stbw) library component, not stb_image itself, but is affected when stb_image.h is used as a dependency.Affected if This function is called in your code or in any library that depends on your stb integration
-
Identify Header Array Handler usageSearch for references to 'header array', 'stbhw', or related tile/tilemap functions. The vulnerability is in the Header Array Handler component within the tileset building functions.Affected if Your code or dependencies use tileset-related functions from stb that invoke the Header Array Handler
-
Check input validation on the 'w' width parameterReview code paths that call stbhw_build_tileset_from_image. Trace where the 'w' (width) argument originates - whether it comes from image dimensions, user input, or file data. Verify if bounds checking exists before the function call.Affected if The 'w' parameter is passed without validation against the actual image buffer dimensions, or no runtime bounds checks are performed
You are affected if stb_image.h version 2.13 or lower is in use AND code path calls stbhw_build_tileset_from_image (or related tileset functions) with unvalidated width parameters to the Header Array Handler.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement rigorous bounds validation on the 'w' argument before any memory access operations in stbhw_build_tileset_from_image. Ensure all array indices are validated against allocated buffer sizes. Consider adding asserts or runtime checks to catch invalid parameters early.
- No patch or upgrade is available for this vulnerability.
- The vendor was contacted but did not respond.
- Monitor the stb project repository (github.com/nothings/stb) for future security updates.
- Consider implementing input validation around the stbhw_build_tileset_from_image function to mitigate out-of-bounds read risks until an official fix is released.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3406 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3406 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data