Springboot AdminFramework / library · Opplus

CVE-2025-3413

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2017-12-26 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability has been found in opplus springboot-admin up to a2d5310f44fd46780a8686456cf2f9001ab8f024 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function code of the file SysGeneratorController.java. The manipulation of the argument Tables leads to deserialization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A deserialization vulnerability in opplus springboot-admin's SysGeneratorController.java allows remote attackers to manipulate the 'Tables' argument to achieve arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability stems from unsafe deserialization of user-controlled input in the code generation functionality.

MitigationImplement strict input validation on the Tables parameter and replace unsafe deserialization with safe serialization formats (JSON/Jackson) or use a whitelisting approach for deserialization. If a vulnerable third-party library is involved, update to a patched version.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Springboot AdminFramework / library
Affected:<= 2017-12-26

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate Opplus Springboot Admin installation
    Search for the springboot-admin application directory or check running Java processes for 'springboot-admin' or 'opplus' in the command arguments
    Affected if The application is present and running
  2. Determine application version
    Check the build artifacts, pom.xml, or application metadata for version information. Compare against the 2017-12-26 release date or earlier.
    Affected if Version is dated 2017-12-26 or earlier
  3. Identify SysGeneratorController exposure
    Inspect the web application's exposed endpoints, typically found in the WAR file or deployed class files. Look for mappings under '/sys/generator' or similar paths referencing SysGeneratorController.
    Affected if The code generation endpoint is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS
  4. Verify Tables parameter acceptance
    Check the SysGeneratorController.java source or decompiled class to confirm it accepts a 'Tables' parameter and performs deserialization on it.
    Affected if The controller processes user input from the Tables parameter without strict validation
  5. Confirm unsafe deserialization usage
    Review the controller's request handling code to identify if the Tables parameter is passed to ObjectInputStream or similar unsafe deserialization mechanisms.
    Affected if The Tables parameter flows directly into unsafe deserialization without validation

A user is affected if Opplus Springboot Admin version 2017-12-26 or earlier is deployed and the SysGeneratorController code generation endpoint accepting the Tables parameter is accessible and uses unsafe deserialization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2017-12-26
Interim mitigation

Implement strict input validation on the Tables parameter and replace unsafe deserialization with safe serialization formats (JSON/Jackson) or use a whitelisting approach for deserialization. If a vulnerable third-party library is involved, update to a patched version.

Fix this in Springboot Admin Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
44.0 hours of engineering $7,720
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3413 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3413 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data