CVE-2025-3424
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe IntelliSpace portal application utilizes .NET Remoting for its functionality. The vulnerability arises from the exploitation of port 755 through the "Object Marshalling" technique, which allows an attacker to read internal files without any authentication. This is possible by crafting specific .NET Remoting URLs derived from information enumerated in the client-side configuration files. This issue affects IntelliSpace Portal: 12 and prior.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA path traversal/unauthenticated file read vulnerability in Philips IntelliSpace Portal allows remote attackers to access internal files via crafted .NET Remoting URLs on port 755 using the Object Marshalling technique. The attack leverages information enumerable from client-side configuration files, enabling unauthenticated access without any credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- Y
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- P
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:P/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Green
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Philips IntelliSpace Portal installationCheck system for presence of Philips IntelliSpace Portal software and note the installed versionAffected if The software is installed and the version falls within the affected range (if known) or is an unpatched version
-
Verify port 755 is listeningRun 'netstat -an | grep 755' or 'ss -tlnp | grep 755' to check if the .NET Remoting port is open and bound to a serviceAffected if Port 755 is open and accepting connections, indicating .NET Remoting is enabled
-
Check .NET Remoting configurationInspect the IntelliSpace Portal configuration files for .NET Remoting endpoint definitions (look for 'TcpChannel' or 'RemotingConfiguration' in config files)Affected if .NET Remoting is configured and exposed on port 755
-
Assess network exposure of port 755Review firewall rules or network perimeter configurations to determine if port 755 is accessible from untrusted networksAffected if Port 755 is accessible from external or untrusted network segments without filtering
-
Review client-accessible configuration filesExamine any configuration files accessible via the web interface or shared directories for .NET Remoting endpoint informationAffected if Configuration files expose .NET Remoting service details that could enable the Object Marshalling attack vector
A user is affected if Philips IntelliSpace Portal is installed with .NET Remoting enabled on port 755 and that port is network-accessible, allowing unauthenticated path traversal via crafted remoting URLs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIf .NET Remoting is not essential for portal functionality, disable or block port 755 at the network perimeter. Otherwise, apply vendor patches when available and restrict network access to the affected port.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3424 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3424 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data