CVE-2025-34244
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdvantech WebAccess/VPN versions prior to 1.1.5 contain a SQL injection vulnerability in AjaxFwRulesController.ajaxDeviceFwRulesAction() that allows an authenticated low-privileged observer user to inject SQL via datatable search parameters, leading to disclosure of database information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdvantech WebAccess/VPN versions prior to 1.1.5 contain a SQL injection vulnerability in the AjaxFwRulesController.ajaxDeviceFwRulesAction() method. An authenticated user with low 'observer' privilege can inject malicious SQL code through datatable search parameters to exfiltrate sensitive database information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.1.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Advantech WebAccess/VPN is installedCheck for WebAccess/VPN installation directories, running services, or the web interface typically accessible on ports 80/443 or custom ports. Look for installation paths such as C:\Program Files\Advantech\WebAccess\VPN or /opt/advantech/webaccess/vpn.Affected if The application is present on the system and the web interface is accessible.
-
Determine the installed WebAccess/VPN versionLocate version information in the installation directory, typically in a version.txt, about.ini, or manifest file. Alternatively, access the login page and check any version display in the UI footer or error pages.Affected if The installed version is any version prior to 1.1.5 (e.g., 1.1.4, 1.1.3, 1.0.x, etc.).
-
Verify the AjaxFwRulesController endpoint is accessibleAttempt to access the vulnerable endpoint path typically at /Ajax/AjaxFwRulesController.ajax or similar paths under the web application root. Use a web browser or curl to send a request to this endpoint.Affected if The endpoint responds (even with an authentication redirect) indicating the vulnerable controller is present and loaded.
-
Confirm authentication is enabled for the web interfaceCheck the web server configuration or authentication settings within WebAccess/VPN to verify that user authentication is required. Try accessing the login page and confirm credentials are required.Affected if The web interface requires authentication, which allows low-privilege 'observer' users to authenticate and reach the vulnerable function.
You are affected if Advantech WebAccess/VPN is installed with a version prior to 1.1.5 and the web interface with user authentication is enabled, allowing authenticated 'observer' users to reach the AjaxFwRulesController endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.1.5
Upgrade to WebAccess/VPN version 1.1.5 or later which contains the vendor fix for this SQL injection vulnerability.
WebAccess/VPN version 1.1.5
- 1. Identify current WebAccess/VPN version by checking the system dashboard or using the built-in version check command
- 2. Download WebAccess/VPN version 1.1.5 from the official Advantech download portal or support site (icr.advantech.com)
- 3. Create a full backup of the current system configuration and database
- 4. Stop all WebAccess/VPN services before applying the upgrade
- 5. Install version 1.1.5 using the official upgrade procedure documented in the installation guide
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version number
- 7. Restart WebAccess/VPN services
- 8. Log in and verify the AjaxFwRulesController functionality is working properly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34244 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34244 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data