CVE-2025-34288
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability where a user-accessible maintenance script runs with sudo privileges as root but includes/imports an application file that is writable by lower-privileged users. A local attacker with application account access can modify this writable file to inject malicious code, which executes with root privileges when the maintenance script is invoked.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2024= 2026CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Nagios XI installation and versionRun 'rpm -q nagios-xi' or check '/usr/local/nagiosxi/version.txt' for the installed version numberAffected if Version is 2024 or earlier, or is 2026 without being 2026R1.1 or later
-
Locate maintenance scripts with sudo privilegesRun 'sudo -l' as the nagios application user to list commands that can be executed with elevated privileges, or examine /etc/sudoers for nagios-related entriesAffected if Any maintenance or utility script is configured to run as root via sudo
-
Identify files imported or included by sudo-enabled scriptsExamine the source code of sudo-permitted maintenance scripts to find any files they import, source, or include (look for 'include', 'require', 'source', or similar directives)Affected if The maintenance script references or loads any external application files
-
Check file permissions on imported application filesRun 'ls -la' on each imported/included file identified in the previous step to check write permissionsAffected if Any file that a root-privileged maintenance script loads or includes is writable by non-root users (shows 'w' permission for group or other, or is owned by the nagios user)
A user is affected if Nagios XI is installed with a version prior to 2026R1.1 and there exists a sudo-enabled maintenance script that loads or includes a file writable by non-root users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to Nagios XI 2026R1.1 or later to obtain the vendor patch. Alternatively, audit and restrict sudo permissions for maintenance scripts and ensure application files are not world-writable by removing inappropriate file permissions.
2026R1.1
- Verify current Nagios XI version by navigating to Admin > System Information in the web UI or running: cat /usr/local/nagiosxi/etc/xiversion.txt
- Download Nagios XI 2026R1.1 or later from the official Nagios download portal at https://www.nagios.com/products/
- Backup the current Nagios XI installation including the database, configuration files, and any custom scripts: mysqldump -u root -p nagiosxi > /backup/nagiosxi_$(date +%Y%m%d).sql
- Run the official Nagios XI upgrade installer as root: ./upgrade.sh or use the web-based upgrade via Admin > System Info > Check for Updates > Upgrade Now
- Verify the upgrade completed successfully by checking the version shows 2026R1.1 or later
- Confirm the vulnerable maintenance scripts and included files now have correct permissions (should not be world-writable)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34288 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34288 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data