CVE-2025-34307
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIPFire versions prior to 2.29 (Core Update 198) contain a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability that allows an authenticated attacker to inject arbitrary JavaScript code through the pienumber parameter when updating the firewall country search defaults. When a user updates the default values for the firewall country search, the application issues an HTTP POST request to /cgi-bin/logs.cgi/firewalllogcountry.dat and the default number of countries to display is provided in the pienumber parameter. The value of this parameter is stored and later rendered in the web interface without proper sanitation or encoding, allowing injected scripts to execute in the context of other users who view the affected firewall country search settings.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIPFire versions prior to 2.29 contain a stored XSS vulnerability in the firewall country search settings. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary JavaScript via the pienumber parameter in a POST request to /cgi-bin/logs.cgi/firewalllogcountry.dat. The injected payload is stored and rendered without sanitization, executing in the context of other users who view the affected settings.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.29= 2.29CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check IPFire versionAccess the IPFire web interface and navigate to the System page, or run 'rpm -q ipfire' or 'cat /etc/system.cfg' from the console to determine the installed version.Affected if The installed version is any version prior to 2.29, or exactly version 2.29 (Core Update 198). Versions 2.29 (Core Update 199) and later are not affected.
-
Verify firewall country search featureIn the IPFire web interface, navigate to the Logs section and check if the firewall country search settings (firewalllogcountry.dat) are accessible or have been configured.Affected if The feature is present and accessible to authenticated users.
-
Inspect configuration for suspicious entriesExamine the configuration files or database where the firewall country search settings are stored. Look for any unexpected or encoded content in fields related to the pienumber parameter.Affected if Any unsanitized JavaScript or HTML tags are found stored in the configuration, particularly in fields associated with the country search pienumber parameter.
A user is affected if their IPFire installation is version 2.29 or earlier AND the firewall country search feature is accessible to authenticated users who could inject malicious payloads via the pienumber parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.29
Upgrade IPFire to version 2.29 (Core Update 198) or later, which contains the patch for this vulnerability. Until upgraded, restrict access to the firewall country search settings to trusted administrators only.
IPFire 2.29 Core Update 199 or later
- 1. Access the IPFire administrative interface
- 2. Navigate to the System section and select 'Force update' or check for available updates
- 3. Ensure the system updates to Core Update 199 or later (IPFire version > 2.29)
- 4. After updating, verify the version by checking the IPFire web interface dashboard
- 5. Confirm the fix by testing the pienumber parameter in /cgi-bin/logs.cgi/firewalllogcountry.dat to ensure proper input sanitization is now in place
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34307 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34307 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data