CVE-2025-34468
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedlibcoap versions up to and including 4.3.5, prior to commit 30db3ea, contain a stack-based buffer overflow in address resolution when attacker-controlled hostname data is copied into a fixed 256-byte stack buffer without proper bounds checking. A remote attacker can trigger a crash and potentially achieve remote code execution depending on compiler options and runtime memory protections. Exploitation requires the proxy logic to be enabled (i.e., the proxy request handling code path in an application using libcoap).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in libcoap's address resolution where attacker-controlled hostname data is copied into a fixed 256-byte stack buffer without bounds checking. Exploitation requires the proxy logic to be enabled, allowing a remote attacker to potentially achieve RCE.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.3.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify libcoap versionRun `coap-client --version` or check package manager output (`dpkg -l libcoap*`, `rpm -qa | grep libcoap`, or `brew list libcoap`). If compiled from source, check the version string in source files or the library filename.Affected if version is 4.3.5 or earlier (including any 4.x.x version up to 4.3.5)
-
Determine if proxy functionality is enabledSearch application configuration files or runtime settings for coap-proxy features. If using a libcoap-based application, review its startup logs or configuration for proxy-related options (such as `proxy` directive, port 5684/5685 proxy ports, or proxy URI parameters).Affected if proxy logic is enabled or configurable in the deployment
You are affected if libcoap version is 4.3.5 or earlier AND proxy functionality is enabled in your application or service.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate libcoap to version 4.3.6 or later (post commit 30db3ea) which contains proper bounds checking. If patching is not immediately possible, disable proxy functionality until the update can be applied.
libcoap 4.3.6 or later (commit 30db3ea and beyond)
- 1. Identify all applications and systems using libcoap with proxy functionality enabled
- 2. Locate the libcoap library installation (check build systems, package dependencies, or embedded copies)
- 3. Download or obtain libcoap source code from the official repository: https://github.com/obgm/libcoap
- 4. Verify the fix by checking out or downloading code after commit 30db3ea (or version 4.3.6 and later if available)
- 5. Rebuild the library with the fixed code: ./configure && make
- 6. Replace the vulnerable libcoap library in all affected applications
- 7. Rebuild and redeploy all applications that link against libcoap
- 8. Verify the proxy functionality still works correctly after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,576.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34468 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34468 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data