Incorrect AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-863

CVE-2025-3476

CRITICAL · 9.4 CVSS v4.0 Published 2025-05-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in OpenText™ Operations Bridge Manager. The vulnerability could allows privilege escalation by authenticated users.This issue affects Operations Bridge Manager: 2023.05, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Incorrect authorization vulnerability in OpenText Operations Bridge Manager allows authenticated users to escalate privileges beyond their assigned role. The flaw likely involves missing or insufficient access control checks on certain API endpoints or functions, enabling lower-privileged users to perform administrative actions.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches for affected versions (2023.05, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4). Until patched, minimize the number of authenticated users and restrict network access to trusted personnel only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
Authentication
Y
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:H/U:Red

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Operations Bridge Manager installation
    Locate the OpenText Operations Bridge Manager installation directory and locate the main executable or service (typically named opentext-obb or similar in the installation path)
    Affected if The product is installed and running
  2. Determine installed version
    Check the version of Operations Bridge Manager by inspecting the product's about dialog, version file, or running 'opcntop version' or similar version command if available in the installation bin directory
    Affected if The installed version matches or predates any vulnerable release prior to the vendor fix
  3. Verify user role configuration
    Review the user/role configuration files in the OBM configuration directory (typically under conf/users or conf/security) to confirm role assignments and permission boundaries are defined
    Affected if Users with limited roles are defined in the system
  4. Check for privilege boundary enforcement
    Inspect the authorization or security configuration files (such as authorization.xml, security-config.xml, or role-mappings in the conf directory) to verify if role boundaries are properly enforced
    Affected if Authorization rules appear misconfigured or allow role boundary crossing
  5. Audit user session and privilege usage
    Review OBM audit logs (typically in logs/audit or logs directory) for authenticated user sessions that show access to features or data outside their assigned role permissions
    Affected if Audit logs show users accessing functions beyond their assigned role scope

A user is affected if OpenText Operations Bridge Manager is installed and the installed version predates the fixed release, especially if the authorization role boundary enforcement is improperly configured or can be bypassed by authenticated users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches for affected versions (2023.05, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4). Until patched, minimize the number of authenticated users and restrict network access to trusted personnel only.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
44.0 hours of engineering $7,720
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3476 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3476 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data