CVE-2025-35031
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMedical Informatics Engineering Enterprise Health includes the user's current session token in debug output. An attacker could convince a user to send this output to the attacker, thus allowing the attacker to impersonate that user. This issue is fixed as of 2025-04-08.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMedical Informatics Engineering Enterprise Health incorrectly writes user session tokens to debug output. An attacker who obtains this debug output (e.g., by convincing a user to share log files or error reports) can extract the session token and hijack the user's session, effectively impersonating that user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= rc202403= rc202409= rc202503CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed versionAccess the Mieweb Enterprise Health administration interface or check the application version metadata. Look for a version string in the format rcYYYYMM (e.g., rc202403, rc202409, rc202503).Affected if The installed version matches rc202403, rc202409, or rc202503 exactly.
-
Locate debug and log directoriesIdentify the directories where Mieweb Enterprise Health stores debug output, application logs, and error reports. Common locations include the application data folder, logs subdirectory, or a dedicated diagnostics folder.Affected if Debug logging or error reporting is enabled and logs are being written to accessible locations.
-
Search logs for session tokensOpen the debug output and log files identified in step 2. Search for patterns that resemble session tokens, authentication tokens, or session identifiers. Look for keywords such as 'session', 'token', 'auth', or session ID formats.Affected if Log files contain any session tokens, session IDs, or authentication credentials in plain text.
-
Inspect recent error reportsReview any recent error reports, crash dumps, or diagnostic exports that may have been generated by users or the system. Check these files for exposed session data.Affected if Error reports or diagnostic exports contain session tokens or user authentication data.
A defender is affected if their Mieweb Enterprise Health version is rc202403, rc202409, or rc202503 AND debug logging is enabled such that session tokens appear in log files or debug output.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataEnsure the 2025-04-08 patch is applied. Until then, review and sanitize any debug/logging output to prevent session token exposure, and educate users not to share debug output with untrusted parties.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-35031 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-35031 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data