CVE-2025-35972
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled search path for the Intel MPI Library before version 2021.16 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIntel MPI Library before version 2021.16 contains an uncontrolled search path vulnerability (DLL/library hijacking) that allows an authenticated, local attacker with high complexity and active user interaction to load a malicious library, potentially achieving privilege escalation. The vulnerability exists in Ring 3 user applications.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Intel MPI Library installationSearch for mpi library files in common installation directories such as C:\Program Files\Intel\ on Windows or /opt/intel/ on Linux, or check for mpi.dll, impi.dll, or mpirun executableAffected if Intel MPI Library is not found on the system, then the vulnerability does not apply
-
Determine installed versionRun the command 'mpirun --version' or 'mpivars.bat -version' if available, or right-click on the main library DLL file and view Properties > Details for the version numberAffected if The version cannot be determined or is earlier than 2021.16
-
Compare version to affected rangeCompare the installed version number to version 2021.16 - any version before 2021.16 is affectedAffected if Installed version is any release before 2021.16 (for example 2021.14, 2021.12, 2021.10, etc.)
-
Assess library search path accessibilityExamine directory permissions on folders where Intel MPI Library is installed and any directories in the library search path, checking that unauthorized users cannot write files to these locationsAffected if Directories in the library search path allow write access to untrusted users, enabling DLL/library hijacking
The system is affected if Intel MPI Library is installed with a version earlier than 2021.16 and directories in its search path have weak permissions allowing an attacker to place a malicious library.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Intel MPI Library to version 2021.16 or later. Additionally, ensure secure file permissions on directories in the library search path to prevent unauthorized library placement.
2021.16
- Identify the currently installed Intel MPI Library version using 'mpirun --version' or checking the installation directory
- Download Intel MPI Library version 2021.16 or later from the official Intel download center or through your Intel subscription
- Uninstall the current version of Intel MPI Library if upgrading via a fresh install, or run the installer for the new version to update in-place
- Verify the installation was successful by checking the version shows 2021.16 or later
- Ensure the MPI library binaries are located in a trusted directory with secure permissions to prevent DLL hijacking
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-35972 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-35972 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data