CVE-2025-35995
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen a BIG-IP PEM system is licensed with URL categorization, and the URL categorization policy or an iRule with the urlcat command is enabled on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial of service vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP PEM systems allows undisclosed requests to crash the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) when URL categorization policies or iRules using the urlcat command are enabled on a virtual server. The vulnerability is triggered by specifically crafted requests that cause TMM to terminate, disrupting all traffic processing for affected virtual servers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.7.0.4.5>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify BIG-IP PEM versionRun 'tmsh show /sys version' or check the version through the web UI under System > Software Management > Volume Name. Compare the installed version against the affected ranges: 15.1.0 to 15.1.10.7.0.4.5, 16.1.0 to 16.1.6, or 17.1.0 to 17.1.2.Affected if The installed version falls within any of the affected version ranges.
-
List virtual servers with PEM URL categorization policiesRun 'tmsh list /pem policy' to enumerate all PEM policies. For each policy, inspect whether URL categorization rules are defined. Cross-reference with virtual servers assigned these policies using 'tmsh list /ltm virtual <name>' for each virtual server.Affected if Any virtual server has a PEM policy with URL categorization rules enabled.
-
Search for iRules using the urlcat commandRun 'tmsh list /ltm rule all' to list all iRules. Search the output for any iRule containing 'urlcat' as this command is used for URL categorization. Identify which virtual servers have these iRules assigned via their profiles.Affected if Any virtual server has an iRule that invokes the urlcat command.
-
Confirm attack surface exposureCross-reference the virtual servers identified in steps 2 and 3 with the affected version identified in step 1. Determine if TMM is actively processing traffic on these virtual servers using 'tmsh show /ltm virtual' or similar commands.Affected if The BIG-IP runs an affected version AND has virtual servers with either URL categorization policies or urlcat iRules enabled.
You are affected if your BIG-IP PEM runs an affected version (15.1.x before 15.1.10.7.0.4.5, 16.1.x before 16.1.6, or 17.1.x before 17.1.2) AND has any virtual server with URL categorization policies or iRules using the urlcat command enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.1.10.7.0.4.516.1.617.1.2.2
Apply the F5 vendor patch when available. Until then, consider disabling URL categorization policies or urlcat iRules on affected virtual servers if operationally feasible, or implement additional upstream DDoS/DOS protections.
15.1.0-15.1.10.x -> 15.1.10.7.0.4.5 or later; 16.1.0-16.1.x -> 16.1.6 or later; 17.1.0-17.1.x -> 17.1.2.2 or later
- 1. Identify the current BIG-IP PEM version by running 'tmsh show sys version' or checking the GUI at System > Software > IMAGE/DETAILS
- 2. Confirm URL categorization policy or iRules with 'urlcat' command are in use on virtual servers
- 3. Schedule a maintenance window as the upgrade may require brief service interruption
- 4. Create a UCS backup before upgrading: 'tmsh save sys ucs <backup-name>'
- 5. Download the appropriate hotfix from F5 Downloads (my.f5.com) for your version branch
- 6. Install the hotfix via GUI (System > Software > Upload) or CLI: 'tmsh install sys software hotfix <hotfix-file> volume <volume>'
- 7. After installation, verify the fix is applied by checking the version matches or exceeds the fixed release for your branch
- 8. Test that TMM remains stable and URL categorization functions correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-35995 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-35995 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data