Aspera FaspexApplication · Ibm

CVE-2025-36039

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-31
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.0.12.1 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.12.1 could allow an authenticated user to perform unauthorized actions due to client-side enforcement of sever side security mechanisms,

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Aspera Faspex versions 5.0.0 through 5.0.12.1 contains a security vulnerability where the client application enforces security mechanisms that should be enforced server-side. This allows authenticated users to bypass authorization controls and perform actions they should not be permitted to perform, likely through manipulated client-side requests or direct object references.

MitigationImplement proper server-side authorization checks for all sensitive operations. Move security validation logic from client to server and verify user permissions before executing any action, regardless of client-supplied parameters.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Aspera FaspexApplication
Affected:>= 5.0.0, <= 5.0.12.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify IBM Aspera Faspex installation
    Locate the Faspex installation directory or check system services for Aspera Faspex processes. Common locations include /opt/aspera/faspex or C:\Program Files\Aspera\Faspex. Check for a version file or use system package management tools to query the installed package.
    Affected if IBM Aspera Faspex is found installed on the system
  2. Determine the installed version number
    Read the version file in the installation directory, use the Faspex command-line interface if available (such as 'faspex --version' or looking in admin panels), or query the application through its web interface which typically displays version information in the footer or about page.
    Affected if The version is 5.0.0 through 5.0.12.1 inclusive
  3. Verify the application is running and accessible
    Check if the Faspex web service or daemon is active and responding. Attempt to access the login page or API endpoint to confirm the application is operational.
    Affected if The application is running and accessible to users who can authenticate

A user is affected if IBM Aspera Faspex version 5.0.0 through 5.0.12.1 is installed and the application is running, allowing authenticated users to potentially exploit client-side validation bypass.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.0.12.1
Interim mitigation

Implement proper server-side authorization checks for all sensitive operations. Move security validation logic from client to server and verify user permissions before executing any action, regardless of client-supplied parameters.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.13 or later

  1. Check the IBM Aspera Faspex downloads or support page for version 5.0.13 or later
  2. Download the latest available version of IBM Aspera Faspex
  3. Review the release notes for security updates related to CVE-2025-36039
  4. Plan maintenance window for the upgrade
  5. Back up current configuration and data
  6. Install the upgraded version following standard IBM Aspera upgrade procedures
  7. Verify the installation and test that the client-side enforcement vulnerability is remediated
  8. Confirm all user roles and permissions function correctly post-upgrade
Caveat Review release notes for any configuration or feature changes that may affect existing workflows

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Aspera Faspex Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-36039 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-36039 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data