CVE-2025-36106
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Cognos Analytics Mobile (iOS) 1.1.0 through 1.1.22 could allow malicious actors to view and modify information coming to and from the application which could then be used to access confidential information on the device or network by using a the deprecated or misconfigured AFNetworking library at runtime.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Cognos Analytics Mobile (iOS) versions 1.1.0 through 1.1.22 uses a deprecated and misconfigured AFNetworking library that lacks proper SSL certificate pinning, allowing man-in-the-middle attacks. This enables attackers to intercept, view, and modify encrypted network traffic between the application and backend servers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.1.0, < 1.1.23CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed version of IBM Cognos Analytics MobileOpen the App Store or your device's app settings to view the installed version number. Compare this version against the affected range: 1.1.0 through 1.1.22Affected if The installed version is 1.1.0, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5, 1.1.6, 1.1.7, 1.1.8, 1.1.9, 1.1.10, 1.1.11, 1.1.12, 1.1.13, 1.1.14, 1.1.15, 1.1.16, 1.1.17, 1.1.18, 1.1.19, 1.1.20, 1.1.21, or 1.1.22
-
Inspect network traffic for certificate validationUse a proxy tool like Burp Suite or Charles Proxy to intercept traffic from the IBM Cognos Analytics Mobile app. Observe whether the app validates server certificates properly or accepts invalid certificates without warningAffected if The app accepts connections to the backend without proper SSL/TLS certificate validation, allowing the proxy to intercept traffic without detection
-
Check if SSL certificate pinning is enforcedAttempt a man-in-the-middle test by introducing an untrusted certificate. If the app connects successfully without rejecting the invalid certificate, SSL pinning is not properly enabledAffected if The app does not reject connections when presented with an invalid or self-signed SSL certificate, indicating certificate pinning is disabled or misconfigured
-
Verify the AFNetworking library is in useIf you have access to the application binary or can inspect the app bundle, search for the presence of the AFNetworking library (libAFNetworking.a or AFNetworking.framework) within the application packageAffected if The application bundle contains the deprecated AFNetworking library, indicating the vulnerable library is still in use
You are affected if the installed version falls within 1.1.0 to 1.1.22 and the app either uses the deprecated AFNetworking library or fails to properly validate SSL certificates, allowing intercepted network traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.1.23
Upgrade to a newer version of IBM Cognos Analytics Mobile that replaces the deprecated AFNetworking library with a current, properly configured networking library with SSL pinning enabled, or apply vendor-supplied patches.
1.1.23 or later
- Update IBM Cognos Analytics Mobile to version 1.1.23 or later via the Apple App Store
- Verify the update was successful by checking the app version in the iOS App Store or device settings
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,136.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-36106 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-36106 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data