CVE-2025-36124
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 25.0.0.8 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions caused by a failure to honor JMS messaging configuration
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty versions 17.0.0.3 through 25.0.0.8 fails to properly honor JMS (Java Message Service) messaging security configuration, allowing a remote attacker to potentially bypass security restrictions. The vulnerability stems from incorrect handling of JMS security settings in the Liberty profile.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.0.0.3, < 25.0.0.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify WebSphere Liberty installation and versionLocate the Liberty installation directory and check the version. In the Liberty root directory, examine the file 'product-info/product-version' or run 'java -jar wlp-webProfileX.jar --version' if available. Alternatively, check the 'lib/versions' directory for version information.Affected if The installed version falls within 17.0.0.3 through 25.0.0.8 inclusive.
-
Verify JMS messaging features are enabledExamine the server.xml configuration file (typically in the wlp/usr/servers/<serverName>/ directory). Look for JMS-related feature definitions such as 'messaging-3.0', 'messaging-2.0', 'jms-2.0', or older 'jms-1.0' features in the <featureManager> section.Affected if JMS messaging features are enabled in the server configuration.
-
Inspect JMS security configuration settingsReview the server.xml file for JMS security-related configuration elements. Look for <jmsQueue> or <jmsTopic> definitions with security settings, and check for <security> or <jaasLogin> entries that control JMS message security. Also inspect any resource adapter configurations related to JMS.Affected if JMS messaging security is configured but the configuration may not be properly enforced due to the vulnerability.
-
Check for JMS message-driven bean deploymentsExamine the applications deployed in the Liberty profile. Look for message-driven beans (MDBs) or JMS client applications in the 'usr/servers/<serverName>/apps' directory or deployed EAR/WAR files. Check corresponding XML deployment descriptors for JMS destination configurations.Affected if Applications using JMS message-driven beans or JMS producers/consumers are deployed.
You are affected if your WebSphere Liberty version is between 17.0.0.3 and 25.0.0.8 inclusive AND you have JMS messaging features enabled with security configurations that may not be properly honored.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped25.0.0.9
Apply the IBM fix for this vulnerability (check IBM security bulletins for CVE-2025-36124) or upgrade to a patched version of WebSphere Liberty beyond 25.0.0.8. Review JMS messaging security configurations to ensure they are being properly enforced.
25.0.0.9 or later (preferably latest 25.0.x release)
- 1. Back up the current WebSphere Application Server Liberty installation and configuration
- 2. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty version 25.0.0.9 or later from IBM's official Fix Central or entitlement repository
- 3. Install the new version following IBM's installation documentation for your deployment model
- 4. Validate JMS messaging configuration is properly honored in the new version
- 5. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment before deploying to production
- 6. Deploy the validated upgrade to production environments
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,128.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-36124 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-36124 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data