CVE-2025-36143
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Lakehouse (watsonx.data 2.2) could allow an authenticated privileged user to execute arbitrary commands on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM watsonx.data 2.2 (IBM Lakehouse) contains a command injection vulnerability where improper validation of user-supplied input allows an authenticated privileged user to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying system. This is a classic input validation failure where user data is passed to system shell commands without adequate sanitization.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm IBM watsonx.data installationIdentify if IBM watsonx.data or IBM Lakehouse software is present in the environment. Check system inventory, installed packages, or application listings for 'watsonx.data' or 'IBM Lakehouse' components.Affected if The product IBM watsonx.data is not present in the environment.
-
Verify installed versionDetermine the exact version of IBM watsonx.data installed. Compare your installed version against the affected range: version 2.2.Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.2, indicating the specific version affected by this CVE.
-
Check for privileged user accessIdentify if authenticated privileged users exist in the watsonx.data authentication system. Review user role configurations and determine if any users have elevated privileges that could access functionality interacting with system commands.Affected if Privileged user accounts are configured and the command injection requires an authenticated privileged user to trigger.
-
Audit for command injection indicatorsReview system logs, application audit logs, and security event logs for evidence of unexpected command execution, shell command anomalies, or suspicious command patterns originating from watsonx.data components.Affected if Unusual command execution patterns or shell invocations are found in logs, suggesting active exploitation or attempted exploitation.
The environment is affected if IBM watsonx.data version 2.2 is installed and privileged authenticated users have access to functionality that processes user-supplied input through system commands.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and sanitization for all user-supplied parameters, preferably using parameterized queries or avoiding shell command execution entirely. Apply principle of least privilege to limit which authenticated users can access functionality that interacts with system commands.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-36143 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-36143 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data