CVE-2025-36515
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled search path for some AI Playground software before version 3.0.0 alpha within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAI Playground software before version 3.0.0 alpha has an uncontrolled search path vulnerability in Ring 3 user applications. An authenticated attacker with high complexity and active user interaction can potentially achieve privilege escalation by placing malicious DLLs or executables in locations where the vulnerable application loads resources from an insecure search path.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- A
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AI Playground installation locationSearch for 'AI Playground' in program files directories (e.g., C:\Program Files\, C:\Program Files (x86)\, or custom installation paths). Look for executables named 'AI Playground', 'ai-playground', or similar. Also check for uninstall entries in Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\UninstallAffected if AI Playground software is found installed on the system
-
Determine installed version of AI PlaygroundRight-click the executable file, select Properties, and check the Version tab. Alternatively, run the executable with a version flag (e.g., --version or -v) from command line, or check Add/Remove Programs for the installed versionAffected if The version is lower than 3.0.0 alpha (e.g., 2.x.x, 1.x.x, or any version without the '3.0.0 alpha' designation)
-
Check application directory write permissionsRight-click the AI Playground installation folder, select Properties, go to the Security tab, and review write permissions for Users or authenticated users group. From command line, use 'icacls "<path_to_app_folder>"' to list permissionsAffected if Users or authenticated users have Write or Modify permissions on the application directory
-
Check working directory write permissionsIdentify the working directory (where the application is launched from or where it stores user data). Use 'icacls' or folder properties to check if standard users can write to this location. Check common locations like Documents, user profile folders, or application data foldersAffected if Standard non-admin users have Write permissions to directories where AI Playground loads resources or stores data
-
Inspect DLL search path behaviorUse Process Monitor (procmon) from Sysinternals to monitor AI Playground at startup. Filter by Path including '.dll'. Observe which directories the application searches for DLLs and whether it loads from user-writable locations before system pathsAffected if The application loads DLLs from user-writable directories or exhibits insecure DLL search order (current directory, application directory without safe DLL search mode)
A user is affected if AI Playground version is below 3.0.0 alpha AND standard users can write to directories where the application loads resources from an insecure search path, allowing DLL hijacking for privilege escalation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to version 3.0.0 alpha or later which implements secure search path handling. If updating is not immediately possible, ensure the application directory and working directories are not writable by unprivileged users.
Intel AI Playground 3.0.0 alpha
- 1. Verify the current installed version of Intel AI Playground software
- 2. Download Intel AI Playground version 3.0.0 alpha or later from the official Intel website or Intel support channels
- 3. Ensure all running instances of AI Playground are closed before upgrading
- 4. Install version 3.0.0 alpha following standard installation procedures
- 5. Restart the application after installation to ensure the updated components are loaded
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-36515 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-36515 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data