CVE-2025-3708
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLe-show medical practice management system from Le-yan has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database contents.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceLe-show medical practice management system from Le-yan contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands. The vulnerability permits reading, modifying, and deleting database contents without any authentication credentials, indicating direct exposure of database query input to user-supplied data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.2.25CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Le Show Le Yan versionAccess the application admin panel or check the software's about/version page. If unavailable, examine the application's main DLL, executable, or configuration file for a version string. Compare this version number against the affected range: any version <= 3.2.25 is potentially vulnerable.Affected if The installed version is 3.2.25 or any earlier version.
-
Verify the application is network accessibleConfirm the Le Show Le Yan web interface is reachable over HTTP/HTTPS from your network or the internet. Since this is an unauthenticated SQL injection, the vulnerable endpoint is accessible without any login credentials.Affected if The application is externally accessible without authentication and the version is <= 3.2.25.
-
Test for SQL injection error exposureSubmit a simple SQL special character such as a single quote (') in any publicly accessible input field (login, search, patient lookup, or form parameters). Observe whether the application returns a database syntax error message.Affected if Database error messages are displayed in the response, indicating unsanitized input is passed to database queries.
-
Inspect web server access logs for SQL injection patternsReview web server (IIS, Apache, or nginx) access logs for requests containing SQL keywords (UNION, SELECT, INSERT, DELETE) or characters like quotes, OR 1=1, or comment sequences (--, /*) in URL parameters. Filter logs for the application endpoint.Affected if Suspicious SQL-like patterns appear in logs targeting the Le Show application without prior authentication.
-
Check database user privilegesExamine the database user account used by the Le Show application. Determine whether this account has excessive privileges beyond read-only operations (such as DROP, DELETE, or administrative functions).Affected if The application database user has elevated privileges that could allow an attacker to read, modify, or delete arbitrary data.
You are affected if the installed Le Show Le Yan version is 3.2.25 or any earlier version, the application is network-accessible, and user-supplied input can trigger SQL errors or be injected into database queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database operations, apply input validation and sanitization, and restrict database user privileges to minimum necessary. Consider deploying a WAF as a compensating control while remediation is underway.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3708 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3708 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data