Heap-based Buffer OverflowWeakness · CWE-122

CVE-2025-3713

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The LCD KVM over IP Switch CL5708IM has a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in firmware versions prior to v2.2.215, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to exploit this vulnerability to perform a denial-of-service attack.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The LCD KVM over IP Switch CL5708IM contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in firmware versions prior to v2.215, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to send specially crafted packets that overflow heap memory buffers, causing the device to crash and perform a denial-of-service attack.

MitigationUpdate the device firmware to version v2.2.215 or later to patch the heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm device model is CL5708IM
    Access the device's web interface, console, or check the physical device label to verify the model number is exactly CL5708IM
    Affected if The device model is CL5708IM
  2. Retrieve the current firmware version
    Log into the device's admin interface or console and navigate to the firmware/version information section, or use the device's 'show version' or 'system info' command via console/SSH
    Affected if The firmware version cannot be determined or is not displayed
  3. Compare firmware version to v2.215
    Compare the installed firmware version string to the affected range: any version prior to v2.215 (or v2.2.215) is vulnerable. Note that version numbering may appear as 2.2.15 or 2.215 - treat both as prior to the patched release
    Affected if The firmware version is lower than v2.215 (or v2.2.215)
  4. Verify remote network accessibility
    Confirm the device has an active IP address and network services enabled (HTTP/HTTPS, TCP ports for KVM over IP). Check if the device is reachable from untrusted networks
    Affected if The device is network-accessible and has remote management services enabled

The device is affected if it is a CL5708IM model running firmware version lower than v2.215 (or v2.2.215) and has network remote access enabled, making it reachable for the specially crafted packet attack.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the device firmware to version v2.2.215 or later to patch the heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

v2.2.215

  1. 1. Access the CL5708IM device management interface and check the current firmware version under System Information or Administration settings
  2. 2. Download firmware version v2.2.215 or later from ATEN International's official support website
  3. 3. Access the firmware upgrade section in the device web UI (typically under Administration > Firmware Upgrade)
  4. 4. Upload the downloaded firmware file and initiate the upgrade process
  5. 5. Wait for the upgrade to complete and the device to reboot automatically
  6. 6. Verify the new firmware version is v2.2.215 or later in the System Information page
  7. 7. Test basic KVM functionality to confirm normal operation
Caveat Firmware upgrades on hardware devices may cause temporary service interruption; backup current configuration if possible before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,720
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3713 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3713 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data