Uncontrolled Resource ConsumptionWeakness · CWE-400

CVE-2025-37148

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
70/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the parsing of ethernet frames in AOS-8 Instant and AOS 10 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct a denial of service attack. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to potentially disrupt network services and require manual intervention to restore functionality.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A vulnerability in the ethernet frame parsing logic in AOS-8 Instant and AOS 10 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to send specially crafted ethernet frames that cause a denial of service, requiring manual intervention to restore network services.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches for AOS-8 Instant and AOS 10 when available; until then, implement network segmentation and ingress filtering to limit exposure to untrusted network segments.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Aruba AOS product and version
    Run 'show version' or access the controller CLI to identify the exact AOS version installed (e.g., AOS-8 Instant or AOS-10.x)
    Affected if The installed version is AOS-8 Instant or AOS 10 and falls within the affected version range for CVE-2025-37148 (compare your version to vendor advisories)
  2. Identify ethernet interface exposure
    Review network configuration to determine if Layer 2 (ethernet) interfaces are directly accessible from untrusted network segments or the internet
    Affected if Ethernet interfaces are exposed to untrusted networks without ingress filtering or network segmentation
  3. Check for network service disruption
    Use 'show ap debug system-status' on controllers or monitor for unexpected controller/platform restarts or network outages that correlate with incoming ethernet frame traffic
    Affected if The device exhibits unexplained denial of service symptoms or requires manual intervention to restore network services
  4. Verify interface statistics for anomalies
    Run 'show interface' commands to inspect ethernet interface error counters, especially CRC errors, frame alignment errors, or input drops that may indicate malformed frame processing
    Affected if Interface statistics show abnormal error patterns consistent with malformed ethernet frame attacks
  5. Review recent audit or system logs
    Check system logs for entries related to ethernet frame processing errors, panic events, or unexpected process crashes around the time of service disruption
    Affected if Logs contain entries indicating ethernet frame parsing failures or associated crash events

A user is affected if their Aruba AOS-8 Instant or AOS 10 device is exposed to untrusted network segments and exhibits unexplained Layer 2 service disruptions or requires manual restarts after receiving malformed ethernet frames.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches for AOS-8 Instant and AOS 10 when available; until then, implement network segmentation and ingress filtering to limit exposure to untrusted network segments.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,380
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,608.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-37148 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-37148 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data