CVE-2025-37159
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web management interface of the AOS-CX OS user authentication service could allow an authenticated remote attacker to hijack an active user session. Successful exploitation may enable the attacker to maintain unauthorized access to the session, potentially leading to the view or modification of sensitive configuration data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in the AOS-CX OS web management interface's user authentication service allows an authenticated remote attacker to hijack active user sessions. Successful exploitation enables unauthorized access to view or modify sensitive network configuration data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.10.0000, < 10.10.1170>= 10.13.0000, < 10.13.1101>= 10.14.0000, < 10.14.1060>= 10.15.0000, < 10.15.1030>= 10.16.0000, < 10.16.1001CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AOS-CX firmware versionRun 'show version' or access the switch CLI and run the command to display the installed OS version. Check the version number against the affected ranges.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 10.10.0000 to 10.10.1169, 10.13.0000 to 10.13.1100, 10.14.0000 to 10.14.1059, 10.15.0000 to 10.15.1029, or 10.16.0000 to 10.16.1000.
-
Verify web management interface is enabledCheck if the web management interface (HTTP/HTTPS) is configured and active. Use 'show http-server' or 'show web-management' CLI commands to verify the web interface status.Affected if The web management interface is enabled and accessible.
-
Confirm active user sessions existUse 'show users' or 'show web-session' command to list currently active authenticated sessions on the management interface.Affected if There are active authenticated sessions on the web management interface.
-
Review session management configurationExamine session timeout and session token configuration settings via 'show web-management session' or similar command to understand session handling behavior.Affected if Session token hardening is not implemented or session invalidation on logout is not properly configured.
You are affected if your AOS-CX version is within any of the affected ranges listed AND the web management interface is enabled with active user sessions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.10.117010.13.110110.14.1060
Implement session token hardening, ensure proper session invalidation on logout, and apply vendor patches when available. Limit administrative access and monitor for anomalous session activity.
10.10.1170 (or later 10.10.x), 10.13.1101 (or later 10.13.x), 10.14.1060 (or later 10.14.x), or 10.15.1030 (or later 10.15.x)
- 1. Backup the current ArubaOS CX configuration before performing any upgrade.
- 2. Download the appropriate fixed version from HPE/Aruba support portal (support.hpe.com).
- 3. Upload the new firmware to the Aruba CX switch via the web management interface or CLI.
- 4. Reboot the switch to apply the new firmware.
- 5. After upgrade, verify the system is operational and confirm the version matches the fixed release.
- 6. Test that user authentication and session management are functioning correctly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-37159 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-37159 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data