CVE-2025-3751
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe component listed above contains a vulnerability that can be exploited by an attacker to perform a SQL Injection attack. This could lead to unauthorised access to the database and exposure of sensitive information
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in a component allows attackers to inject malicious SQL queries through unsanitized input, potentially enabling unauthorized database access and exposure of sensitive information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- P
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the affected application componentReview your application's architecture to identify which component handles database operations. Check documentation, dependency lists, or source code for components that process SQL queries.Affected if The component in use matches the one containing the SQL injection flaw (no specific product name provided in CVE data)
-
Determine the installed versionUse your package manager or dependency tool (e.g., pip list, npm list, composer show, or JAR file inspection) to find the exact version of the affected component.Affected if The installed version falls within a vulnerable version range (none publicly documented for this CVE)
-
Inspect code for direct SQL executionSearch source code for raw SQL execution patterns: examine queries built through string concatenation, direct query execution methods, or dynamic SQL construction. Look for patterns like execute(), query(), raw(), or similar database call methods.Affected if Code contains SQL queries built using string concatenation or interpolation rather than parameterized queries/prepared statements
-
Check if user input reaches database queriesTrace the data flow from user input points (HTTP parameters, form fields, API arguments) to database query execution. Identify any input that is not validated, sanitized, or bound as parameters.Affected if User-supplied input flows directly into SQL queries without proper escaping, validation, or parameter binding
-
Verify database account privilegesExamine the database user credentials used by the application. Check what tables, schemas, or operations the account can access.Affected if The application database account has excessive privileges beyond what the application requires
You are affected if your environment uses the vulnerable component with a version that matches the CVE, and your application constructs SQL queries using unsanitized user input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database operations, apply proper input validation and sanitization, and ensure database accounts use least privilege principles.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3751 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3751 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data