CVE-2025-3775
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe ShopLentor – WooCommerce Builder for Elementor & Gutenberg +20 Modules – All in One Solution (formerly WooLentor) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.2 via the woolentor_template_proxy function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application, and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the woolentor_template_proxy function of the ShopLentor WordPress plugin. Unauthenticated attackers can make the web server perform requests to arbitrary URLs, potentially accessing internal services, reading metadata, or pivoting to internal systems.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the ShopLentor plugin installationAccess your WordPress site via FTP or file manager and navigate to /wp-content/plugins/woolentor-addons/ or check the plugin directory listing via SSH. The main plugin file (usually woolentor-addons.php or index.php) contains the version in the plugin header.Affected if The plugin folder 'woolentor-addons' exists in the plugins directory and contains a PHP file with a version declaration.
-
Determine the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin PHP file and look for the 'Version:' field in the plugin header comment, or check the changelog/readme.txt file for the version number.Affected if The version number found is less than 3.1.3 (for example, 3.1.2, 3.1.1, 3.0.x, etc.).
-
Check if the woolentor_template_proxy endpoint existsExamine the plugin source files for the woolentor_template_proxy function. Search for 'woolentor_template_proxy' in the PHP files within the plugin directory using grep or a file search.Affected if The function woolentor_template_proxy is present in the plugin code, indicating the vulnerable code path exists.
-
Verify the endpoint is accessibleSend a test HTTP request to yourdomain.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=woolentor_template_proxy (or the specific endpoint path if different) using curl or a browser. Check if the server accepts and processes the request without authentication.Affected if The endpoint responds and does not require authentication, allowing unauthenticated access to the proxy functionality.
Your environment is affected if ShopLentor plugin version is below 3.1.3 AND the woolentor_template_proxy endpoint is present and accessible without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.1.3
Update ShopLentor plugin to version 3.1.3 or later. If immediate update is not possible, disable the plugin or implement WAF rules to block requests to the woolentor_template_proxy endpoint.
3.1.3
- Update the ShopLentor (formerly WooLentor) plugin to version 3.1.3 or later
- Verify the update was successful by checking the plugin version in WordPress admin > Plugins
- Confirm the woolentor_template_proxy function is no longer vulnerable by ensuring the plugin is updated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3775 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3775 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data