CVE-2025-3804
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability classified as critical has been found in thautwarm vscode-diana 0.0.1. Affected is an unknown function of the file Gen.py of the component Jinja2 Template Handler. The manipulation leads to injection. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA Jinja2 template injection vulnerability exists in vscode-diana version 0.0.1 in the Gen.py file's Jinja2 Template Handler component. The vulnerability allows for injection attacks and requires local access to exploit.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if vscode-diana is installedRun 'pip show vscode-diana' or check your extension/plugin directory for vscode-dianaAffected if vscode-diana version 0.0.1 is installed
-
Locate the Gen.py fileSearch for Gen.py in the vscode-diana installation directory, typically under the package root or templates directoryAffected if Gen.py exists in the vscode-diana package at version 0.0.1
-
Inspect Gen.py for Jinja2 template handlingOpen Gen.py and search for Jinja2 imports (e Environment, Template) or template rendering callsAffected if Gen.py contains Jinja2 template rendering code using Environment or Template classes without sanitization
-
Verify template injection input pathExamine how user input flows into the template rendering in Gen.py - check for template.render() or environment.from_string() calls receiving raw inputAffected if Raw user input or unsanitized variables are passed directly to Jinja2 template rendering functions
If vscode-diana version 0.0.1 is installed with Gen.py containing Jinja2 template handling that accepts unsanitized input, the environment is affected by CVE-2025-3804.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataFix the template handling in Gen.py by implementing proper input sanitization/validation and using safe template rendering practices (e.g., autoescape, whitelist approaches) when processing Jinja2 templates.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3804 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3804 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data