CVE-2025-3910
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in Keycloak. The org.keycloak.authorization package may be vulnerable to circumventing required actions, allowing users to circumvent requirements such as setting up two-factor authentication.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe org.keycloak.authorization package in Keycloak contains a flaw that allows authenticated users to bypass required actions such as two-factor authentication setup. This authorization bypass occurs when the system fails to properly enforce required actions before granting access to protected resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 26.0, < 26.0.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Keycloak versionCheck the Keycloak server version by querying the /health/ready endpoint, viewing the startup logs, or running 'kc.sh show-version' (for the Keycloak container/instance)Affected if The version is >= 26.0.0 and < 26.0.11 (specifically any version from 26.0 up to but not including 26.0.11)
-
Verify if required actions are configured in authentication flowsNavigate to the Keycloak Admin Console, go to Authentication > Flows, and review the configured authentication flows to see if any required actions (such as 'Configure OTP', 'Terms and Conditions', or other required actions) are definedAffected if Required actions are assigned but may not be properly enforced before resource access is granted due to the authorization bypass in the org.keycloak.authorization package
-
Inspect authentication flow bindingsGo to Authentication > Bindings in the Admin Console and check which authentication flow is set as the 'Browser Flow' and 'Direct Grant Flow', then examine those flows for required action configurationAffected if The flows contain required action executors but the org.keycloak.authorization component fails to enforce them before granting access to protected resources
-
Review realm authentication settingsNavigate to Realm Settings > Login in the Admin Console and check if 'Required Actions' are enabled (such as 'Configure OTP' for two-factor authentication)Affected if Required actions are enabled in the realm settings but the authorization layer bypasses their enforcement for authenticated users accessing protected resources
A user is affected if they are running Redhat Build of Keycloak versions 26.0.0 through 26.0.11 and have required actions (like 2FA setup) configured in their authentication flows, as the org.keycloak.authorization package fails to properly enforce these actions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped26.0.11
Organizations using Keycloak should monitor for vendor security advisories and apply patches when available. In the interim, implement additional access controls and monitor for unauthorized access patterns that may indicate exploitation of this bypass.
26.0.11 or later
- 1. Back up your current Keycloak installation and database
- 2. Download Keycloak version 26.0.11 or later from the official Keycloak releases page (github.com/keycloak/keycloak/releases)
- 3. Upgrade your Keycloak instance to version 26.0.11 or later following the standard upgrade documentation
- 4. Verify that the org.keycloak.authorization package properly enforces required actions such as 2FA setup
- 5. Test that users can no longer bypass required actions after the upgrade
- 6. Monitor logs for any authentication-related anomalies
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-3910 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-3910 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data