CVE-2025-39395
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in mojoomla WPAMS apartment-management allows SQL Injection.This issue affects WPAMS: from n/a through <= 44.0 (17-08-2023).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA critical SQL injection vulnerability exists in the WPAMS (WordPress Apartment Management System) plugin from mojoomla, affecting all versions up to and including 44.0. The vulnerability allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user input in SQL queries, potentially enabling unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate WPAMS plugin in WordPress installationNavigate to wp-content/plugins/ directory and look for a folder named 'wpams' or 'wp-ams' or check via WordPress admin panel under Plugins > Installed Plugins for 'WPAMS' or 'WordPress Apartment Management System' by mojojamanAffected if WPAMS plugin is present and active in the WordPress installation
-
Identify installed WPAMS versionCheck the main plugin file (usually wpams.php or index.php inside the plugin folder) for the 'Version' header comment, or view the plugin details in WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed PluginsAffected if Version number is 44.0 or lower (any version up to and including 44.0 is affected)
-
Verify plugin is using vulnerable SQL query patternsExamine PHP files in the wpams plugin folder for direct SQL queries using $wpdb->query(), $wpdb->get_results(), or similar without prepare() statements or parameterization, especially where $_POST, $_GET, or $_REQUEST variables are inserted directly into queriesAffected if Plugin code contains SQL queries that incorporate user input ($_POST/$_GET/$_REQUEST) without using $wpdb->prepare() or parameterized queries
-
Confirm vulnerable endpoint is accessibleIdentify which PHP file and parameter contains the unsanitized input (common locations include frontend submission forms, search parameters, or admin ajax endpoints), then verify the corresponding page or endpoint is publicly accessible or accessible to low-privileged usersAffected if A vulnerable SQL query with unsanitized user input exists AND that functionality is accessible to users (not disabled or restricted)
You are affected if the WPAMS plugin is installed with any version 44.0 or lower and contains unsanitized SQL queries that use user input directly in database operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade WPAMS to a patched version beyond 44.0 that properly implements parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database interactions, and conduct thorough security testing to verify remediation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-39395 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-39395 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data