CVE-2025-39403
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in mojoomla WPAMS apartment-management allows SQL Injection.This issue affects WPAMS: from n/a through <= 44.0 (17-08-2023).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in mojoomla WPAMS (WordPress Apartment Management System) plugin allows attackers to inject malicious SQL queries through unsanitized input in certain parameters. The vulnerability affects versions up to and including 44.0, with a CVSS 8.5 indicating high severity due to potential for data exfiltration or privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm WPAMS plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins, or check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for the wpams folderAffected if WPAMS plugin is present and active in the WordPress installation
-
Check installed WPAMS versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and find the WPAMS plugin version, or open the main plugin file (usually wpams.php) and look for the 'Version' header in the plugin commentsAffected if The version is 44.0 or lower, as versions up to 44.0 are affected by this SQL injection vulnerability
-
Inspect plugin for SQL query handlingExamine PHP files in the WPAMS plugin directory (particularly files handling form submissions, search functions, or user-provided data) for direct SQL queries using $wpdb->prepare, mysql_query, or similar without proper parameterizationAffected if SQL queries exist that use unsanitized user input (such as $_POST, $_GET, or $_REQUEST variables) directly in query strings without escaping or prepared statements
-
Check for vulnerable input handlingReview plugin files that process user-supplied parameters (search parameters, form fields, ID values) and verify if these inputs are used in database queries without sanitization functions like esc_sql(), $wpdb->prepare(), or parameterized queriesAffected if User input from request parameters is concatenated or inserted directly into SQL queries without sanitization
The environment is affected if WPAMS plugin version 44.0 or lower is installed and the plugin processes user input in SQL queries without proper sanitization or prepared statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the latest vendor patch when available. In the interim, validate and sanitize all user-supplied input before using it in SQL queries, and implement prepared statements/parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-39403 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-39403 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data