Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-39430

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alexander Rauscha mLanguage mlanguage allows Stored XSS.This issue affects mLanguage: from n/a through <= 1.6.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the mLanguage WordPress plugin (versions <= 1.6.1) allows authenticated attackers to trick administrators into submitting malicious requests that result in Stored XSS. The lack of proper CSRF token validation on state-changing operations enables attackers to inject persistent malicious scripts through plugin settings or content areas.

MitigationImplement WordPress nonces and CSRF token validation on all form submissions and AJAX actions within the plugin. Additionally, apply proper input sanitization and output escaping to prevent stored XSS execution. Update to a patched version once released.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify mLanguage plugin is installed
    Check if the mLanguage plugin directory exists in your WordPress installation at wp-content/plugins/mlanguage/ or look for it in the WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins
    Affected if mLanguage plugin directory exists in wp-content/plugins/
  2. Check installed version of mLanguage plugin
    Open the main plugin file (mlanguage.php) in wp-content/plugins/mlanguage/ and locate the Version field in the plugin header comment block, or view the version in the WordPress admin plugins list
    Affected if Version number displayed is 1.6.1 or lower
  3. Confirm plugin is active on the site
    Check the WordPress admin dashboard under Plugins to see if mLanguage is activated, or query the wp_options table for the active_plugins option and verify it contains mlanguage
    Affected if Plugin shows as Active in WordPress admin or active_plugins option contains mlanguage

Your environment is affected if the mLanguage plugin is installed, active, and running version 1.6.1 or lower, as this enables CSRF-based attacks leading to stored XSS.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement WordPress nonces and CSRF token validation on all form submissions and AJAX actions within the plugin. Additionally, apply proper input sanitization and output escaping to prevent stored XSS execution. Update to a patched version once released.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

mLanguage version > 1.6.1 (verify exact fixed version from WordPress plugin repository or vendor)

  1. 1. Check the WordPress plugin repository or vendor documentation for mLanguage to identify the fixed release version
  2. 2. If a version newer than 1.6.1 is available, upgrade the mLanguage plugin to that version through the WordPress admin dashboard or via wp-cli: wp plugin update mlanguage
  3. 3. After updating, verify the plugin is functioning correctly and test that multilingual functionality works as expected
  4. 4. Confirm the CSRF protection is now properly implemented by reviewing the plugin's nonce validation in forms and AJAX requests
Caveat Review plugin changelog for any breaking changes between current and new version before upgrading in production

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-39430 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-39430 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data