CVE-2025-39479
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in smartiolabs Smart Notification allows Blind SQL Injection. This issue affects Smart Notification: from n/a through 10.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA blind SQL injection vulnerability exists in smartiolabs Smart Notification (versions through 10.3) due to improper neutralization of special elements in SQL commands. An attacker can inject malicious SQL queries through unsanitized input parameters, potentially allowing extraction of sensitive data from the database via blind inference techniques.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Smart Notification installationLocate the Smart Notification application on the system. Check for installation directories, services, or web application files associated with smartiolabs Smart Notification.Affected if The software is present on the system
-
Determine the installed versionQuery the application for its version number. This may be available via the web interface, a configuration file, an API endpoint, or the application's About/Version information. Common locations include version files, manifest files, or the application's response headers.Affected if The installed version is 10.3 or any version earlier than 10.3
-
Identify database-connected featuresReview the application's functionality to determine which features accept user input and interact with a backend database. Focus on forms, search fields, API parameters, and any endpoint that processes user-submitted data.Affected if User-accessible input fields exist that query a database
-
Test for SQL injection entry pointsExamine the application's input handling for parameters that are used in SQL queries without visible sanitization or use of parameterized queries. For blind SQL injection, observe differences in application behavior (response times, error messages, or conditional responses) when submitting SQL meta-characters (such as single quotes, semicolons, or Boolean-based payloads) in input parameters.Affected if User-supplied parameters are passed directly to SQL queries without prepared statements or input validation
The environment is affected if Smart Notification version 10.3 or earlier is installed and user-controlled input is processed through SQL queries without parameterized queries or input sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database interactions, apply strict input validation on user-supplied data, and conduct a comprehensive code audit to identify and remediate all SQL injection entry points in the application.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-39479 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-39479 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data