CVE-2025-39580
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in jidaikobo Dashi dashi allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Dashi: from n/a through <= 3.1.8.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Broken Access Control (Missing Authorization) vulnerability in jidaikobo Dashi dashi where the application fails to properly enforce authorization checks on certain functionality. An unauthenticated or unauthorized attacker could potentially access sensitive functions or data that should be protected by Access Control Lists (ACLs). The fix requires implementing proper authorization validation on all sensitive endpoints and functions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Dashi installation path and versionLocate the Dashi application directory and check for a version file (often version.php, VERSION.txt, or similar in the root installation folder). Alternatively, check the HTTP response headers or a /admin/status page if available.Affected if The installed version is 3.1.8 or lower, as versions up to 3.1.8 contain the missing authorization vulnerability.
-
Check for sensitive admin or configuration endpointsProbe common administrative paths such as /admin/, /admin/config, /admin/settings, /admin/user, or API endpoints under /api/admin/ using a web browser or curl. Observe whether these endpoints return expected content without requiring authentication.Affected if Sensitive endpoints return data or allow actions without requiring login credentials, indicating missing authorization checks.
-
Verify ACL or role-based access control configurationExamine the application's configuration files (look for acl.php, config/acl.yaml, config/rbac.php, or similar) in the installation directory. Check whether role definitions and permission mappings exist and are properly loaded.Affected if No ACL configuration file exists, or the file exists but critical functions lack role/permission restrictions, meaning authorization is not enforced.
-
Test unauthenticated access to protected functionsAttempt to invoke sensitive functions directly via curl or browser, such as user management, data export, or system configuration actions, without providing any session or API token.Affected if The application executes the requested action or returns protected data without rejecting the request, confirming the broken access control.
A user is affected if the Dashi version is 3.1.8 or lower and sensitive endpoints or functions can be accessed or executed without authentication or proper authorization validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks and role-based access control (RBAC) across all application functionality, particularly functions that should be constrained by ACLs. Review the affected version (up to 3.1.8) for vulnerable code paths and apply vendor patches when available.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-39580 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-39580 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data