CVE-2025-39592
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in WP Shuffle Subscribe to Unlock Lite subscribe-to-unlock-lite allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Subscribe to Unlock Lite: from n/a through <= 1.3.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceLocal File Inclusion vulnerability in WP Shuffle Subscribe to Unlock Lite plugin allows attackers to include arbitrary PHP files from the server due to improper control of filename parameters in include/require statements, potentially leading to code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the plugin is installedIn WordPress admin dashboard, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'WP Shuffle Subscribe to Unlock Lite' or check the plugin files in wp-content/plugins/ directory for the plugin folderAffected if The plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed plugin versionCheck the plugin's main PHP file (usually index.php or the main plugin file) for the 'Version' header comment in the file header, or look in the plugin's readme.txt fileAffected if The installed version matches or falls within the vulnerable version range (compare against the official vulnerability advisory for specific version numbers)
-
Confirm the plugin is activeIn WordPress admin > Plugins, check if 'WP Shuffle Subscribe to Unlock Lite' shows as 'Active'Affected if The plugin is active and accessible to potentially malicious users
-
Check for exposure of vulnerable include/require codeReview plugin PHP files for include/require statements that use unsanitized variables for file paths (look for patterns like 'include($_GET[...])' or 'require($variable)')Affected if The plugin contains include/require statements using user-controllable file paths without proper validation
If the plugin is installed and active, and its code contains include/require statements with unsanitized file path parameters, the environment is likely affected by this LFI vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of the plugin. If no patch is available, disable the plugin and review code to add proper input validation/sanitization on file path parameters used in include/require functions.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-39592 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-39592 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data