CVE-2025-4056
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in GLib. A denial of service on Windows platforms may occur if an application attempts to spawn a program using long command lines.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceGLib's program spawning functionality on Windows does not properly handle long command lines, leading to a denial of service when applications attempt to spawn programs with excessively long arguments.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.84.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Windows platformVerify the operating system is Windows. This vulnerability only affects GLib on Windows platforms. Check system properties or run 'systeminfo' on Windows or 'uname -a' on Unix-like systems to identify the OS.Affected if The system is NOT running Windows - the vulnerability does not apply to non-Windows platforms.
-
Identify GLib installationLocate the GLib library on the system. On Windows, check for glib.dll in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32, or application-specific paths). Use 'where glib.dll' or examine the application's dependencies with tools like Dependencies Walker or dumpbin.Affected if GLib is not installed on the system - the vulnerability does not apply.
-
Determine GLib versionCheck the version of the installed GLib DLL. Right-click glib.dll, select Properties, then Details to view File Version. Alternatively, use a tool like exiftool or examine the version resource embedded in the DLL.Affected if The installed GLib version is 2.84.1 or higher - the version is not affected by this CVE.
-
Verify application uses program spawningIdentify if any applications on the system use GLib's program spawning functions (g_spawn* functions such as g_spawn_command_line_sync, g_spawn_async, g_spawn_sync, g_spawn_command_line_async). Review application source code if available, or monitor process behavior during execution.Affected if No applications use GLib's spawning functions - the denial of service condition cannot be triggered through this attack surface.
A user is affected if they are running Windows with GLib version lower than 2.84.1 AND have applications that use GLib's program spawning functionality with long command line arguments.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.84.1
Limit command line lengths used when spawning programs on Windows, and apply any available GLib updates/patches that address this handling issue.
Glib 2.84.1
- Identify the current Glib version installed on your system (e.g., run `pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0` or check your package manager)
- Update your system's package repository to ensure you have access to the latest packages
- Upgrade Glib to version 2.84.1 or later using your system's package manager (e.g., `apt update && apt install libglib2.0-dev` on Debian/Ubuntu, `dnf update glib2` on Fedora/RHEL, or `yum update glib2` on CentOS)
- If building from source, download Glib 2.84.1 or later from the official GNOME GitLab repository and compile following the standard build process
- Verify the upgraded version matches or exceeds 2.84.1
- Rebuild any dependent applications if necessary to ensure compatibility with the new Glib version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,152.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4056 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4056 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data