CVE-2025-40579
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE LPE9403 (6GK5998-3GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V4.0 HF0). Affected devices are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow. This could allow a non-privileged local attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device or to cause a denial of service condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in SCALANCE LPE9403 devices (6GK5998-3GS00-2AC2) running firmware versions prior to V4.0 HF0. This memory corruption flaw allows a non-privileged local attacker to overwrite stack memory and potentially achieve arbitrary code execution or trigger a denial of service condition on the affected industrial network device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is SCALANCE LPE9403Inspect the device hardware label or access the device web management interface to verify the model number matches 6GK5998-3GS00-2AC2Affected if Device model is SCALANCE LPE9403 with part number 6GK5998-3GS00-2AC2
-
Locate firmware version informationAccess the device web interface, command line interface, or management console and navigate to the system information or firmware version display areaAffected if Firmware version cannot be determined or is not visible
-
Compare installed firmware version against V4.0 HF0Document the current firmware version number displayed in the device management interface or CLI output, then compare it to the fixed version V4.0 HF0Affected if Firmware version is any version prior to V4.0 HF0 (including all legacy versions, beta releases, and interim updates)
-
Verify vulnerability is locally exploitableConfirm the device is accessible via local physical ports or local network segments, as the CVE describes a local attack vectorAffected if Device has local physical access or local network accessibility for non-privileged users
A SCALANCE LPE9403 device is affected if it is the 6GK5998-3GS00-2AC2 model and runs any firmware version earlier than V4.0 HF0.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied firmware update to version V4.0 HF0 or later. Prior to deployment, validate the update in a staging environment to ensure compatibility with the operational industrial network. Limit physical and local network access to affected devices to reduce attack surface.
V4.0 HF0
- 1. Identify the current firmware version of the SCALANCE LPE9403 device (6GK5998-3GS00-2AC2) by accessing the device management interface or checking the firmware file currently installed.
- 2. Compare the current version against V4.0 HF0 - any version below V4.0 HF0 is affected by the stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability.
- 3. Obtain the fixed firmware version V4.0 HF0 (or later) from the official Siemens download portal at cert-portal.siemens.com or through your authorized Siemens support channel.
- 4. Follow Siemens' standard firmware update procedure for the SCALANCE LPE9403 device to apply the V4.0 HF0 firmware upgrade.
- 5. After upgrading, verify that the device is running firmware version V4.0 HF0 or higher and confirm normal operation.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-40579 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-40579 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data