CVE-2025-40592
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Mendix Studio Pro 10 (All versions < V10.23.0), Mendix Studio Pro 10.12 (All versions < V10.12.17), Mendix Studio Pro 10.18 (All versions < V10.18.7), Mendix Studio Pro 10.6 (All versions < V10.6.24), Mendix Studio Pro 11 (All versions < V11.0.0), Mendix Studio Pro 8 (All versions < V8.18.35), Mendix Studio Pro 9 (All versions < V9.24.35). A zip path traversal vulnerability exists in the module installation process of Studio Pro. By crafting a malicious module and distributing it via (for example) the Mendix Marketplace, an attacker could write or modify arbitrary files in directories outside a developer’s project directory upon module installation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA zip path traversal vulnerability exists in Mendix Studio Pro's module installation process. By crafting a malicious module with path traversal sequences (e.g., ../../) embedded in zip file entries, an attacker can write or modify arbitrary files outside the developer's intended project directory when the module is installed. This allows file write/modify access to locations on the filesystem that should be restricted.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Mendix Studio Pro installationCheck for Mendix Studio Pro installation directory, typically at C:\Program Files\Mendix\ or look for Mendix Studio Pro in the Windows Start MenuAffected if Mendix Studio Pro is installed on the system
-
Determine installed versionOpen Mendix Studio Pro, go to Help > About, or check the version file in the installation directory (version.txt or similar)Affected if The installed version is lower than the patched versions (V10.23.0, V10.12.17, V10.18.7, V10.6.24, V11.0.0, V8.18.35, V9.24.35) and thus unpatched
-
Confirm module installation feature usageCheck if the user has imported or installed any modules into their Mendix projects, particularly from external sourcesAffected if Modules have been installed in any Mendix project using the module import feature
-
Assess module source trustReview the source of installed modules - determine if any were obtained from third-party sources outside the official Mendix Marketplace or from untrusted developersAffected if Modules from untrusted or unknown sources have been installed
-
Inspect project directory structureCheck the project's local directory for any unexpected files or directories that appear outside the intended project folder structure, which could indicate prior exploitationAffected if Unexpected files or directories exist outside the project folder that were not intentionally created
The user is affected if Mendix Studio Pro is installed with an unpatched version (below the fixed releases) and modules have been installed, especially from untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Mendix Studio Pro to one of the patched versions: V10.23.0, V10.12.17, V10.18.7, V10.6.24, V11.0.0, V8.18.35, or V9.24.35. Exercise caution when installing modules from untrusted sources such as the Mendix Marketplace until upgraded.
V10.23.0 (10.x), V10.12.17 (10.12.x), V10.18.7 (10.18.x), V10.6.24 (10.6.x), V11.0.0 (11.x), V8.18.35 (8.x), V9.24.35 (9.x)
- Identify the current installed version of Mendix Studio Pro by checking Help > About in the application
- Determine which major version line (8, 9, 10, or 11) your installation belongs to
- For Mendix Studio Pro 8: upgrade to version V8.18.35 or higher
- For Mendix Studio Pro 9: upgrade to version V9.24.35 or higher
- For Mendix Studio Pro 10.6.x: upgrade to version V10.6.24 or higher
- For Mendix Studio Pro 10.12.x: upgrade to version V10.12.17 or higher
- For Mendix Studio Pro 10.18.x: upgrade to version V10.18.7 or higher
- For Mendix Studio Pro 10.x (latest): upgrade to version V10.23.0 or higher
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-40592 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-40592 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data