CVE-2025-40602
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA local privilege escalation vulnerability due to insufficient authorization in the SonicWall SMA1000 appliance management console (AMC).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the SonicWall SMA1000 appliance management console (AMC) due to insufficient authorization checks. An authenticated local attacker could exploit inadequate access controls in the AMC to elevate privileges beyond their assigned role, potentially gaining administrative access to the appliance.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 12.4.3-03245>= 12.5.0, < 12.5.0-02283< 12.4.3-03245>= 12.5.0, < 12.5.0-02283< 12.4.3-03245>= 12.5.0, < 12.5.0-02283< 12.4.3-03245>= 12.5.0, < 12.5.0-02283< 12.4.3-03245>= 12.5.0, < 12.5.0-02283CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SMA appliance modelLog into the SMA device and navigate to the dashboard or system status page to confirm the exact model number (Sma6200, Sma6210, Sma7200, Sma7210, or Sma8200v)Affected if The model is one of the affected SMA1000 series appliances
-
Check installed firmware versionNavigate to System > Status or About page in the SMA management interface to view the current firmware version, or run the command 'diag -v' or check '/var/log/messages' for version informationAffected if Firmware version is < 12.4.3-03245 OR >= 12.5.0 and < 12.5.0-02283
-
Verify AMC is accessibleConfirm the Appliance Management Console (AMC) feature is enabled and accessible by accessing the AMC interface via the management IP or checking AMC service statusAffected if AMC is enabled and accessible to local users
-
Review user role assignmentsCheck the local user accounts and their assigned roles in the SMA management console under User Management or Access Management settingsAffected if There are non-administrator local user accounts configured
A user is affected if they run an SMA1000 series appliance (6200, 6210, 7200, 7210, or 8200v) with firmware version below 12.4.3-03245 or between 12.5.0 and 12.5.0-02283, where AMC is accessible to local authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.4.3-0324512.5.0-02283
Apply the vendor-supplied patch or firmware update for the SMA1000 series when available. Until then, restrict physical and logical access to the AMC to trusted administrative personnel only and monitor for unauthorized access attempts.
Upgrade to firmware 12.4.3-03245 or later (12.4.x branch) OR firmware 12.5.0-02283 or later (12.5.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current firmware version of the affected SonicWall SMA100 appliance (Sma6200, Sma6210, Sma7200, Sma7210, or Sma8200v)
- 2. If running version < 12.4.3-03245, plan upgrade to version 12.4.3-03245 or later in the 12.4.x branch
- 3. If running version >= 12.5.0 and < 12.5.0-02283, plan upgrade to version 12.5.0-02283 or later in the 12.5.x branch
- 4. Before upgrading, backup the current configuration
- 5. Download the appropriate firmware from the official SonicWall support portal (psirt.global.sonicwall.com)
- 6. Upload and apply the firmware upgrade through the SMA management console
- 7. After upgrade, verify the new firmware version is running and confirm the management console is functional
- 8. Validate that the fix addresses the authorization vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-40602 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-40602 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data