CVE-2025-40619
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBookgy does not provide for proper authorisation control in multiple areas of the application. This deficiency could allow a malicious actor, without authentication, to reach private areas and/or areas intended for other roles.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceBookgy suffers from broken access control vulnerabilities in multiple application areas, allowing unauthenticated attackers to bypass authorization checks and access private functionality or escalate privileges to reach resources intended for other user roles.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Bookgy installationIdentify whether the target application is Bookgy by checking application banners, headers, or known Bookgy-specific paths/endpointsAffected if The application is confirmed to be Bookgy Bookgy (any version)
-
Identify accessible endpointsPerform enumeration of the application to map all available endpoints, URIs, and API routes that do not require authenticationAffected if Unauthenticated users can access endpoints that should require authorization
-
Test protected resource access without credentialsAttempt to access private, admin, or role-specific functionality (such as user management, reporting, configuration panels) without providing valid authentication tokens or session cookiesAffected if Protected resources are accessible to unauthenticated users
-
Verify role-based access enforcementCreate or use accounts with different privilege levels (e.g., standard user, viewer) and attempt to access resources designated for higher-privilege rolesAffected if Lower-privileged accounts can access resources intended for higher-privileged roles or other user roles
-
Check for authorization bypass in API endpointsInspect API calls and request payloads to determine if authorization logic is consistently enforced across all endpoints, including indirect object referencesAffected if Authorization checks are missing or inconsistently applied across application endpoints
If the Bookgy application is present and any protected resources or administrative functions are accessible without proper authentication or across privilege boundaries, the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement consistent role-based access control (RBAC) checks across all application endpoints, ensuring proper authorization validation before granting access to any protected resources or administrative functions.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-40619 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-40619 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data