CVE-2025-40636
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSQL injection vulnerability in Joomla module mod_vvisit_counter v2.0.4j3. This vulnerability allows an attacker to retrieve database content via the ‘cip_vvisitcounter’ cookie at all endpoints where the plugin counts visits.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Joomla module mod_vvisit_counter v2.0.4j3 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through the unvalidated 'cip_vvisitcounter' cookie parameter. The cookie value is used directly in SQL queries without proper sanitization or parameterized queries, enabling database content extraction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if mod_vvisit_counter module is installedNavigate to Joomla administrator panel, go to Extensions > Modules, and search for 'mod_vvisit_counter' in the list of installed modulesAffected if The module appears in the installed modules list
-
Verify the module versionIn Extensions > Modules, click on the mod_vvisit_counter entry and check the version displayed in the module details or manifest file at /modules/mod_vvisit_counter/mod_vvisit_counter.xmlAffected if Version is 2.0.4j3 or earlier (no fixed version provided, but this is the known vulnerable version)
-
Confirm the module is enabledIn Extensions > Modules, check the status column for mod_vvisit_counter - look for a green checkmark or 'Enabled' statusAffected if The module status shows as Enabled or Published
-
Inspect cookie parameter usage in the module codeExamine the module's main PHP file (typically /modules/mod_vvisit_counter/helper.php or similar) for direct use of $_COOKIE['cip_vvisitcounter'] in SQL queries without sanitizationAffected if Code contains direct SQL queries using the cookie value without prepared statements or escaping functions
A user is affected if mod_vvisit_counter version 2.0.4j3 is installed, enabled, and the module code uses the cip_vvisitcounter cookie value directly in SQL queries without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDisable or remove the vulnerable mod_vvisit_counter module immediately. Apply input validation and use parameterized queries for the cookie value, or await an official vendor patch.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-40636 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-40636 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data