Information ExposureWeakness · CWE-200

CVE-2025-40645

HIGH · 8.7 CVSS v4.0 Published 2025-10-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
96/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Exposure of sensitive information in Viday. This vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information about customers by sending an HTTP GET request to “/api/reserva/web/clients” using the “phone” parameter.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Viday exposes a sensitive information disclosure vulnerability in its REST API. The endpoint /api/reserva/web/clients accepts a phone parameter without requiring authentication, allowing any unauthenticated user to query and obtain customer PII including names, contact details, and potentially other sensitive reservation data.

MitigationImplement proper authentication and authorization checks on the /api/reserva/web/clients endpoint to ensure only authorized users can access customer data. Additionally, audit similar API endpoints for consistent security controls.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Viday installation
    Search for Viday web application components, configuration files, or services running in your environment. Check web server logs, application directories, or deployment manifests for references to 'Viday' or the '/api/reserva/' path.
    Affected if Viday reservation system is deployed in your environment
  2. Verify endpoint accessibility
    Send an HTTP GET or POST request to https://[your-host]/api/reserva/web/clients without including any authentication headers, cookies, or tokens. Observe if the endpoint responds.
    Affected if The /api/reserva/web/clients endpoint is reachable and responds to unauthenticated requests
  3. Test phone parameter exposure
    Send a request to /api/reserva/web/clients with a phone parameter (e.g., ?phone=1234567890 or in POST body) containing any test phone number. Examine the response for customer PII such as names, addresses, or reservation details.
    Affected if The endpoint returns customer names, contact information, or reservation data in the response without requiring authentication
  4. Review API access controls
    Examine the application's configuration, API gateway settings, or web server configuration for any authentication or authorization rules applied to /api/reserva/web/clients. Check if the endpoint is explicitly excluded from auth requirements.
    Affected if No authentication is required for the endpoint, or the endpoint is marked as publicly accessible in security configurations

Your environment is affected if the Viday application is running and the /api/reserva/web/clients endpoint is accessible without authentication, returning customer PII in response to phone parameter queries.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authentication and authorization checks on the /api/reserva/web/clients endpoint to ensure only authorized users can access customer data. Additionally, audit similar API endpoints for consistent security controls.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-40645 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-40645 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data