CVE-2025-4067
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability classified as critical has been found in ScriptAndTools Online-Travling-System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/viewpackage.php. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Online-Travelling-System 1.0 contains an improper access control vulnerability in /admin/viewpackage.php, allowing unauthenticated or unauthorized users to access sensitive admin functionality and view package data without proper session validation or role verification.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify application versionLocate and examine the application's version identifier in source files, README, or installation metadata. Common locations include version.php, about.php, or the main index file.Affected if The installed version is Online-Travelling-System version 1.0
-
Verify vulnerable file existsCheck if the file /admin/viewpackage.php exists in the web root or admin directory of the application installation.Affected if The file /admin/viewpackage.php is present in the application filesystem
-
Test unauthenticated endpoint accessMake an HTTP request to /admin/viewpackage.php without providing any session cookies, authentication tokens, or credentials. Alternatively, review web server access logs for successful (200 OK) responses to this endpoint from unauthenticated IP addresses.Affected if The endpoint returns package data or admin functionality without requiring valid authentication credentials or session validation
-
Check for session validation in source codeExamine the /admin/viewpackage.php file for session-related code such as session_start(), $_SESSION validation, or role-based access control checks at the beginning of the file.Affected if The file lacks proper session initialization and role verification logic at the script entry point
If the application is Online-Travelling-System version 1.0 and the /admin/viewpackage.php endpoint is accessible without authentication, the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement robust authentication checks and role-based access control (RBAC) on all admin panel endpoints, ensuring proper session validation and authorization verification before granting access to sensitive functions.
- Restrict access to the /admin/ directory using web server configuration (e.g., .htaccess, nginx location blocks, or IP allowlisting) to prevent unauthorized users from accessing viewpackage.php
- If the application has role-based access control, audit and enforce proper user role validation in admin functionality
- Implement additional authentication checks on /admin/viewpackage.php to verify the user has administrative privileges before processing any requests
- Consider using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) as an additional layer of protection
- Monitor access logs for suspicious requests to /admin/viewpackage.php from non-privileged users
- If the application is open-source, review the source code for the affected file and implement proper privilege checks (e.g., verify session user is admin before allowing access)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4067 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4067 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data