CVE-2025-40773
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in SiPass integrated (All versions < V3.0). Affected server applications contains a broken access control vulnerability. The authorization mechanism lacks sufficient server-side checks, allowing an attacker to execute a specific API request. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to potentially manipulate data belonging to other users.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSiPass integrated versions prior to V3.0 contain a broken access control vulnerability in the server applications. The authorization mechanism fails to perform sufficient server-side validation, allowing an attacker to execute specific API requests and potentially manipulate data belonging to other users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.00CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify SiPass integrated is installedCheck for SiPass integrated installation directory, typically found under C:\Program Files\SiPass or C:\Program Files (x86)\SiPass. Look for siPass.exe or related server executable files.Affected if SiPass integrated server application is found on the system
-
Determine the installed versionRight-click on the siPass.exe or main server executable, select Properties, then check the Details tab for version information. Alternatively, open the SiPass client and look for the version displayed in the About or System Info section.Affected if The version displayed is prior to V3.0 (e.g., 2.x.x or any version number less than 3.00)
-
Identify if server services are runningOpen Windows Services (services.msc) and look for SiPass-related services such as SiPass Server, SiPass Integrated Server, or similar. Check if the service status is Running.Affected if The SiPass server service is installed and running
-
Check for exposed API accessibilityIf the server is accessible over network, attempt to reach common SiPass API endpoints or verify the web interface port is open. Common ports include 443 or 8080 for SiPass web interfaces. Use netstat or port scanning to confirm the server is listening.Affected if The SiPass server API/web interface is accessible (port is open and responding)
-
Verify user isolation configurationLog into the SiPass administrative interface with a standard user account and attempt to access or modify data belonging to a different user account. Document whether cross-user data access is possible without proper authorization.Affected if A user can access or modify data belonging to other users without proper authorization checks
The environment is affected if SiPass integrated server is installed with a version prior to V3.0 and the server service is running, exposing the vulnerable authorization mechanism to users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.00
Upgrade SiPass integrated to version V3.0 or later to obtain the patched authorization mechanisms. Since this is a server-side access control issue, ensure post-upgrade testing verifies that cross-user data isolation is properly enforced.
V3.0
- Identify the current version of SiPass Integrated currently installed
- Confirm the installed version is below V3.0 (vulnerable)
- Obtain the V3.0 upgrade package from Siemens official support portal (cert-portal.siemens.com) or contact Siemens customer support
- Review Siemens release notes and upgrade documentation for V3.0
- Execute the upgrade process following Siemens-provided upgrade instructions
- After upgrade, verify the installed version is V3.0 or higher
- Test that the authorization mechanisms are functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-40773 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-40773 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data