CVE-2025-4083
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA process isolation vulnerability in Thunderbird stemmed from improper handling of javascript: URIs, which could allow content to execute in the top-level document's process instead of the intended frame, potentially enabling a sandbox escape. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 138, Firefox ESR 128.10, Firefox ESR 115.23, Thunderbird 138, and Thunderbird 128.10.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA process isolation vulnerability in Thunderbird allowed javascript: URIs to execute in the top-level document's process instead of the intended sandboxed frame, enabling a sandbox escape. This bypasses the security model that isolates web content into separate processes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 115.23< 138.0>= 128.0, < 128.10< 128.10.0< 138.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Mozilla productCheck if Thunderbird or Firefox is installed on the system by looking in typical installation directories (C:\Program Files\Mozilla Thunderbird, C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox on Windows; /Applications/Thunderbird.app, /Applications/Firefox.app on macOS; /usr/lib/thunderbird, /usr/lib/firefox on Linux) or checking the system's program list.Affected if Either Thunderbird or Firefox is installed, as both are affected by this vulnerability.
-
Get Thunderbird version numberIf Thunderbird is installed, open it and go to Help > About Thunderbird, or check the version.ini or application.ini file in the Thunderbird installation directory. Record the full version number (for example, 128.9.0).Affected if Thunderbird version is less than 128.10.0 or less than 138.0.
-
Get Firefox version numberIf Firefox is installed, open it and go to Help > About Firefox, or check the version.ini or application.ini file in the Firefox installation directory. Record the full version number (for example, 128.9.1).Affected if Firefox version is less than 115.23, OR less than 138.0 while also being 128.0 or higher but less than 128.10.
-
Verify if any affected version is in useCompare the identified version against the affected ranges: for Thunderbird, check if version < 128.10.0 or version < 138.0; for Firefox, check if version < 115.23 OR (version >= 128.0 AND version < 128.10).Affected if The installed version falls into any of the affected ranges, meaning the javascript: URI process isolation flaw is present.
A user is affected if they have Thunderbird below 128.10.0 or below 138.0, or Firefox below 115.23 or between 128.0 and 128.9.x.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped115.23128.10128.10.0
Update Thunderbird to version 138 or 128.10 (or Firefox to version 138, ESR 128.10, or ESR 115.23) to apply the fix for proper javascript: URI handling and process isolation.
Firefox 138 (stable), Firefox ESR 128.10, Firefox ESR 115.23, Thunderbird 138, or Thunderbird 128.10 - choose the appropriate version based on your current release channel
- Identify the current installed version of Firefox or Thunderbird
- If running Firefox ESR 115.x, upgrade to Firefox ESR 115.23 or later
- If running Firefox ESR 128.x, upgrade to Firefox ESR 128.10 or later
- If running Firefox 127.x or earlier, upgrade to Firefox 138 or later
- If running Thunderbird 128.x, upgrade to Thunderbird 128.10 or later
- If running Thunderbird 137.x or earlier, upgrade to Thunderbird 138 or later
- Restart the application after upgrading
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4083 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4083 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data