CVE-2025-40887
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA SQL Injection vulnerability was discovered in the Alert functionality due to improper validation of an input parameter. An authenticated user with limited privileges can execute arbitrary SELECT SQL statements on the DBMS used by the web application, potentially exposing unauthorized data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA SQL Injection vulnerability exists in the Alert functionality due to improper input validation. An authenticated user with limited privileges can inject arbitrary SELECT SQL statements through an unvalidated input parameter, potentially exposing sensitive database information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 25.2.0< 25.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed CMC versionAccess the CMC administration interface or run the command: 'cmc --version' or check the software release information in the system. For appliance deployments, check '/opt/cmc/version' or the about page in the web UI.Affected if The version is lower than 25.2.0 (e.g., 25.1.x, 25.0.x, or earlier)
-
Check installed Guardian versionAccess the Guardian administration interface or run the command: 'guardian --version' or check the software release information in the system. For appliance deployments, check '/opt/guardian/version' or the about page in the web UI.Affected if The version is lower than 25.2.0 (e.g., 25.1.x, 25.0.x, or earlier)
-
Determine if Alert functionality is configuredNavigate to the Alert configuration section in the CMC or Guardian web interface. Check if any alert rules, alert profiles, or alert notifications are defined or enabled.Affected if Any alert rules or alert configurations exist in the system
-
Check for unusual alert-related database accessReview database logs or audit logs for the alert module. Look for SQL queries containing suspicious patterns such as UNION SELECT, boolean-based injection, or time-based sleep functions within alert-related operations.Affected if Unexpected or malicious SQL patterns appear in database query logs related to the Alert feature
You are affected if your CMC or Guardian version is below 25.2.0 AND you have any alert configurations or alert functionality enabled in your environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped25.2.0
Implement parameterized queries (prepared statements) or proper input validation and sanititization for all input parameters in the Alert functionality to prevent SQL injection attacks.
25.2.0 or later for both Cmc and Guardian
- 1. Identify all instances running Cmc or Guardian versions prior to 25.2.0
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- 3. Back up the current configuration and database before proceeding
- 4. Obtain the version 25.2.0 or later from the official vendor distribution channel
- 5. Follow the vendor's standard upgrade procedure for Cmc and Guardian products
- 6. Verify the upgrade completed successfully by checking the product version
- 7. Confirm the SQL injection vulnerability is resolved by testing the Alert functionality with the input that previously triggered the issue
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-40887 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-40887 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data