CVE-2025-40893
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Stored HTML Injection vulnerability was discovered in the Asset List functionality due to improper validation of network traffic data. An unauthenticated attacker can send specially crafted network packets to inject HTML tags into asset attributes. When a victim views the affected assets in the Asset List (and similar functions), the injected HTML renders in their browser, enabling phishing and possibly open redirect attacks. Full XSS exploitation and direct information disclosure are prevented by the existing input validation and Content Security Policy configuration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stored HTML injection vulnerability exists in the Asset List functionality where improper validation of network traffic data allows unauthenticated attackers to inject HTML tags into asset attributes. When users view these affected assets, the HTML renders in their browser, enabling phishing and potential open redirect attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 25.5.0< 25.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed version of Nozominetworks CMCAccess the CMC administrative interface and navigate to System > About or use the CLI command 'cmc --version' to retrieve the exact version numberAffected if The version is less than 25.5.0
-
Check installed version of Nozominetworks GuardianAccess the Guardian administrative interface and navigate to System > About or use the CLI command 'guardian --version' to retrieve the exact version numberAffected if The version is less than 25.5.0
-
Verify Asset List functionality accessibilityNavigate to the Asset List feature in the web interface under Assets > Asset List to confirm the feature is accessible and in useAffected if The Asset List feature is accessible and contains any assets
-
Inspect asset attributes for suspicious HTML contentReview each asset entry in the Asset List, specifically examining network traffic-related fields such as hostname, IP address, device name, or custom attributes for injected HTML tags like <script>, <iframe>, <a href>, or other HTML markupAffected if Any asset attribute contains unescaped HTML tags or script elements that render when viewed
-
Review asset creation logs for unauthorized entriesExamine audit logs or asset creation logs for entries showing asset creation from unauthenticated or unexpected sources, particularly entries with HTML or JavaScript content in data fieldsAffected if Logs show asset creation attempts containing HTML/script tags or entries created by unauthenticated sources
A user is affected if either CMC or Guardian is installed at a version below 25.5.0 AND the Asset List feature is accessible with assets containing unescaped HTML content in their attributes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped25.5.0
Implement strict input validation and sanitization for network traffic data before storing in asset attributes, ensuring all HTML/script tags are stripped or properly encoded at the point of ingestion.
25.5.0
- 1. Identify whether the Cmc or Guardian product is deployed in your environment
- 2. Check the current version of the installed product (Cmc or Guardian)
- 3. Create a backup of the current configuration according to standard backup procedures
- 4. Upgrade Cmc to version 25.5.0 or later
- 5. Upgrade Guardian to version 25.5.0 or later
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version number
- 7. Confirm the Asset List functionality works correctly and that injected HTML tags are no longer rendered
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-40893 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-40893 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data