Apache\Web server / proxy · Grichter

CVE-2025-40932

HIGH · 8.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.01 or later.
See remediation →
91/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Apache::SessionX versions through 2.01 for Perl create insecure session id. Apache::SessionX generates session ids insecurely. The default session id generator in Apache::SessionX::Generate::MD5 returns a MD5 hash seeded with the built-in rand() function, the epoch time, and the PID. The PID will come from a small set of numbers, and the epoch time may be guessed, if it is not leaked from the HTTP Date header. The built-in rand function is unsuitable for cryptographic usage. Predicable session ids could allow an attacker to gain access to systems.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Apache::SessionX versions through 2.01 generates session IDs using MD5 hashes seeded with the insecure built-in rand() function, epoch time, and PID. Since PID comes from a small set and epoch time may be leaked from HTTP headers, attackers can predict session IDs and hijack user sessions.

MitigationReplace the default session ID generator in Apache::SessionX::Generate::MD5 with a cryptographically secure random number generator (e.g., using Crypt::Random or Bytes::Random::Secure) before deploying to production.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Apache\Web server / proxy
Affected:<= 2.01

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Apache::SessionX is installed
    Run 'perl -MApache::SessionX -e print $Apache::SessionX::VERSION' or check your Perl library path for Apache/SessionX.pm
    Affected if The module is present and version is 2.01 or lower
  2. Check the session ID generation module in use
    Inspect your application code or Apache::SessionX configuration for 'Apache::SessionX::Generate::MD5' being used as the generation class
    Affected if The MD5 generator module is explicitly configured or loaded
  3. Verify session ID format
    Generate a few session IDs and examine their format - MD5 hashes are 32 hexadecimal characters
    Affected if Session IDs appear as 32-char hex strings (MD5 format)
  4. Check for predictable ID patterns
    Generate multiple session IDs in short succession and compare them for patterns related to time or sequential values
    Affected if Session IDs show predictable patterns or incrementing values tied to time/PID
  5. Audit session generation code
    Review the Perl module file Apache/SessionX/Generate/MD5.pm if present in your environment
    Affected if The code uses rand(), time(), or $$ (process ID) in the ID generation logic

You are affected if Apache::SessionX version 2.01 or lower is installed and the MD5-based session ID generator is in use, as this creates predictable session IDs from non-cryptographic sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.01
Interim mitigation

Replace the default session ID generator in Apache::SessionX::Generate::MD5 with a cryptographically secure random number generator (e.g., using Crypt::Random or Bytes::Random::Secure) before deploying to production.

Fix this in Apache\ Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,790
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-40932 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-40932 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data