CVE-2025-41019
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSQL injection in Sergestec's SISTICK v7.2. This vulnerability allows an attacker to retrieve, create, update, and delete databases through the 'id' parameter in '/index.php?view=ticket_detail'.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Sergestec SISTICK v7.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the 'id' parameter in the /index.php?view=ticket_detail endpoint. This enables full database compromise including read, write, update, and delete operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if SISTICK is installedCheck for the presence of Sergestec SISTICK application by inspecting web server directories or scanning for SISTICK-specific files and pathsAffected if The application is installed and accessible on the target system
-
Determine SISTICK versionLocate version information in the application (check application configuration files, footer, about page, or version metadata files) and compare to v7.2Affected if The installed version is SISTICK v7.2 or if version cannot be determined but the application matches the affected product
-
Verify ticket_detail endpoint existsAttempt to access or probe /index.php?view=ticket_detail on the web serverAffected if The endpoint responds and is accessible without authentication restrictions
-
Confirm id parameter acceptanceSend a request to the ticket_detail endpoint with an id parameter (e.g., ?id=1) and observe if it is processedAffected if The id parameter is accepted and used in database queries without apparent sanitization
-
Check for input validation or WAF protectionInspect application configuration files, web server settings, or WAF logs for SQL injection protection mechanisms on the ticket_detail endpointAffected if No input validation, parameterized queries, or WAF rules are detected protecting the id parameter
The environment is affected if SISTICK v7.2 is running and the ticket_detail endpoint with the id parameter is accessible without proper SQL injection protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patch for SISTICK v7.2 immediately. If no patch is available, temporarily disable the ticket_detail endpoint or deploy WAF rules to block SQL injection attempts until a fix can be implemented.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-41019 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-41019 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data