CVE-2025-41024
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Poultry Farm Management System v1.0 due to the lack of proper validation of user input by sending a POST request. The relationship between parameters and assigned identifiers is as follows: 'companyaddress', 'companyemail', 'companyname', 'country', 'mobilenumber' y 'regno' parameters in '/farm/farmprofile.php'.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Poultry Farm Management System v1.0 where user input in 'companyaddress', 'companyemail', 'companyname', 'country', 'mobilenumber', and 'regno' parameters in /farm/farmprofile.php is not properly validated, allowing injection of malicious scripts that persist and execute when viewed by other users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Poultry Farm Management System installationLocate the application web root directory and check for the presence of the /farm/farmprofile.php file. Typical paths may include /var/www/html/, /wwwroot/, or the web server document root. Look for the 'farm' subdirectory containing farmprofile.php.Affected if The file farmprofile.php exists in the /farm/ directory under the web root.
-
Verify the installed version is 1.0Check any version files, README files, or the system itself for the version number. Compare your installed version against '1.0' as the only affected version per the CVE scope.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.
-
Determine if farmprofile.php is accessible via webAttempt to access the page via HTTP/HTTPS using the URL pattern: http(s)://<your-server>/farm/farmprofile.php. Check for a 200 OK response indicating the page loads.Affected if The farmprofile.php page loads and is accessible over the network.
-
Check if profile editing functionality existsInspect the farmprofile.php page source or form elements to identify if it contains input fields for companyaddress, companyemail, companyname, country, mobilenumber, and regno parameters.Affected if The page contains form inputs for any of the vulnerable parameters: companyaddress, companyemail, companyname, country, mobilenumber, or regno.
-
Confirm database storage of profile dataCheck if the application has a database (typically MySQL) and look for tables that store company profile information. Verify that submitted data persists in the database rather than being processed only client-side.Affected if User input in the vulnerable parameters is stored in a database and persists across sessions.
You are affected if you are running Poultry Farm Management System version 1.0 with the farmprofile.php page accessible and containing editable fields for companyaddress, companyemail, companyname, country, mobilenumber, or regno parameters where input is stored persistently.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper input validation and output encoding/escaping for all user-supplied data in the affected parameters to prevent XSS execution.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-41024 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-41024 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data