CVE-2025-41049
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been discovered in appRain CMF version 4.0.5, consisting of a stored authenticated XSS due to a lack of proper validation of user input, through the 'data[Addon][layouts]' and 'data[Addon][layouts_except]' parameters in /apprain/developer/addons/update/appform.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored authenticated XSS vulnerability in appRain CMF 4.0.5 allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript through the 'data[Addon][layouts]' and 'data[Addon][layouts_except]' parameters in the addon update functionality at /apprain/developer/addons/update/appform. The lack of proper input validation causes the malicious payload to be stored and executed when other users view affected pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if appRain CMF is installedCheck for the presence of appRain files in your web root, typically looking for index.php and app/Model, app/Controller directories, or check server software for appRain CMF signaturesAffected if appRain CMF is present on the server
-
Confirm the appRain versionLook for a version file or check the header/meta information in the application. Common locations include a config file like app/Config/core.php, a README file, or the meta tags in the main indexAffected if The installed version is exactly 4.0.5
-
Check if the addon update endpoint is accessibleVerify the existence and accessibility of the path /apprain/developer/addons/update/appform on your server. Attempt a HEAD request to confirm the route existsAffected if The addon update functionality at /apprain/developer/addons/update/appform is accessible and present
-
Verify authentication requirements for the affected endpointDetermine if the addon update page requires authentication. Check if unauthenticated access is possible or if session/login is required to reach the vulnerable parameter inputAffected if An authenticated session can be obtained to access the addon update form with the vulnerable parameters
-
Inspect stored data for malicious payloadsExamine the database tables related to addons, specifically any table storing the 'layouts' or 'layouts_except' fields. Query for XSS patterns like <script>, javascript:, or event handlers in these fieldsAffected if The database contains unsanitized input in fields corresponding to data[Addon][layouts] or data[Addon][layouts_except] containing XSS vectors
A user is affected if they are running appRain CMF version 4.0.5 with the addon update functionality accessible to authenticated users and stored XSS payloads exist in the layouts or layouts_except addon configuration fields.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper input validation and output encoding for the 'data[Addon][layouts]' and 'data[Addon][layouts_except]' parameters. Sanitize user-supplied input before storage and encode output when rendering to prevent XSS execution.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-41049 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-41049 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data