CVE-2025-41345
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA lack of authorisation vulnerability has been detected in CanalDenuncia.app. This vulnerability allows an attacker to access other users' information by sending a POST through the parameters 'id_denuncia' and 'id_user' in '/backend/api/buscarDenunciasById.php'.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference) vulnerability in the buscarDenunciasById.php endpoint where the application fails to verify that the requesting user has permission to access the complaint data identified by the id_denuncia and id_user parameters. An attacker can craft a POST request with arbitrary user identifiers to retrieve sensitive complaint information belonging to other users without proper authorization.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.4.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Canaldenuncia.app installationIdentify if Canaldenuncia.app is deployed in your environment. Check for the presence of the application web root directory and look for Canaldenuncia-specific files.Affected if The application is installed and running Canaldenuncia.app version below 4.4.8
-
Locate the vulnerable endpointSearch for the file buscarDenunciasById.php in the web application directory structure. This is typically found within the PHP source code of the Canaldenuncia application.Affected if The file buscarDenunciasById.php exists in the application codebase
-
Verify endpoint accessibilityTest if the buscarDenunciaById.php endpoint is reachable via HTTP POST requests. Attempt a request to the endpoint path to confirm it responds.Affected if The endpoint is accessible and responds to HTTP requests
-
Check for missing authorization logicReview the source code of buscarDenunciaById.php and inspect whether there are server-side authorization checks validating that the authenticated user has permission to access the complaint identified by id_denuncia and id_user parameters.Affected if The code lacks proper authorization validation before returning complaint data
-
Confirm parameter acceptanceSend a test POST request to the endpoint with id_denuncia and id_user parameters containing values for different users to verify the endpoint processes these parameters.Affected if The endpoint accepts id_denuncia and id_user parameters and returns data without verifying user ownership
Your environment is affected if Canaldenuncia.app below version 4.4.8 is installed and the buscarDenunciaById.php endpoint processes requests without validating that the authenticated user owns or has permission to access the specified complaint data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.4.8
Implement server-side authorization checks to validate that the authenticated user has permission to access the specific complaint before returning data. Additionally, enforce proper session validation and consider implementing row-level access controls.
CanalDenuncia.app 4.4.8 or later
- 1. Verify current installation version of CanalDenuncia.app
- 2. Backup the current database and application files before upgrading
- 3. Obtain the updated version (4.4.8 or later) from the official vendor
- 4. Deploy the upgrade following the vendor's standard upgrade procedure
- 5. Verify the fix by testing that unauthorized access to other users' information is no longer possible via the /backend/api/buscarDenunciasById.php endpoint
- 6. Confirm proper authorization checks are in place for the 'id_denuncia' and 'id_user' parameters
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-41345 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-41345 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data