OS Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-78

CVE-2025-41427

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2025-06-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
WRC-X3000GS, WRC-X3000GSA, and WRC-X3000GSN contain an improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in Connection Diagnostics page. If a remote authenticated attacker sends a specially crafted request to the affected product, an arbitrary OS command may be executed.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

OS Command Injection vulnerability in the Connection Diagnostics page of WRC-X3000GS series wireless access points. An authenticated remote attacker can send specially crafted requests to execute arbitrary OS commands on the affected device due to improper neutralization of special elements in user input.

MitigationApply vendor firmware patch when available; until then, restrict administrative access to trusted networks/IPs, disable remote management if not required, and monitor for anomalous diagnostics page requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device model
    Access the device web interface or check the device label/management console to confirm the exact model is WRC-X3000GS series
    Affected if Device model is WRC-X3000GS or WRC-X3000GS2 or related variant
  2. Check firmware version
    Navigate to the device administration page, typically under System > Firmware Upgrade or Status > Device Information, and note the installed firmware version number
    Affected if Firmware version is older than the patched version (if known) or remains unpatched since mid-2025
  3. Verify administrative access is enabled
    Check the device management settings for remote administration/enable remote management options; look for any IP access control lists allowing external IPs
    Affected if Remote administrative access is enabled and the management interface is exposed to untrusted networks
  4. Inspect diagnostics page access
    Log into the device and navigate to the Connection Diagnostics or similar diagnostic tool page; note whether this feature accepts user-supplied input for hostnames or IP addresses
    Affected if The Connection Diagnostics feature accepts user input and is accessible to authenticated users
  5. Check for anomalous requests
    Review device logs or network traffic logs for requests to the diagnostics page containing unusual characters such as semicolons, pipes, backticks, or command separators
    Affected if Logs show diagnostics page requests containing shell metacharacters or evidence of command injection attempts

A user is affected if they have a WRC-X3000GS series device with the Connection Diagnostics feature accessible to authenticated users and the firmware is unpatched for CVE-2025-41427.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor firmware patch when available; until then, restrict administrative access to trusted networks/IPs, disable remote management if not required, and monitor for anomalous diagnostics page requests.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-41427 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-41427 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data