OpenharmonyOperating system · Openatom

CVE-2025-41432

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
in OpenHarmony v5.1.0 and prior versions allow a local attacker arbitrary code execution in pre-installed apps through out-of-bounds write. This vulnerability can be exploited only in restricted scenarios.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

OpenHarmony v5.1.0 and prior versions contain an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in pre-installed applications that can be exploited by a local attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability is classified as high severity (CVSS 7.8) but exploitation is limited to restricted scenarios, likely requiring specific conditions or privileged access within the affected system.

MitigationApply vendor patches from OpenHarmony when available; until then, limit local access to devices running affected versions and restrict installation of untrusted applications to reduce the attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpenharmonyOperating system
Affected:= 5.0.3= 5.1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify OpenHarmony version
    Retrieve the installed OpenHarmony version from the system settings or by querying the system information interface (typically found under Settings > About Device or via system diagnostic commands)
    Affected if The installed version matches 5.0.3 or 5.1.0 exactly, or is any version prior to 5.1.0 (including 5.0.3)
  2. Locate pre-installed applications
    Examine the list of applications that came bundled with the system, typically found in the /system/preinstall/ or /preinstall/ directory on the device filesystem, or via package manager queries that list system-bundled apps
    Affected if Pre-installed applications exist on the device (these are the attack vector for this CVE)
  3. Verify local access conditions
    Determine whether local unprivileged users or third-party applications have the ability to interact with or invoke functionality within pre-installed applications, or if device has developer modes or USB debugging enabled that could allow local code execution
    Affected if Local attackers can execute code or interact with pre-installed app components (the CVE requires a local attacker scenario)
  4. Assess application sandbox status
    Check if the sandboxing or permission model for pre-installed applications restricts their interaction with other apps or system resources
    Affected if Pre-installed applications have elevated privileges or weak sandboxing that could allow an attacker to trigger the out-of-bounds write condition

The environment is affected if running OpenHarmony version 5.0.3 or 5.1.0 (or any prior version) and contains pre-installed applications that can be reached by a local attacker with limited access.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches from OpenHarmony when available; until then, limit local access to devices running affected versions and restrict installation of untrusted applications to reduce the attack surface.

Fix this in Openharmony Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-41432 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-41432 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data