CVE-2025-41433
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) message routing framework (MRF) application layer gateway (ALG) profile is configured on a Message Routing virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a F5 BIG-IP vulnerability where a specifically configured SIP MRF ALG profile on a Message Routing virtual server can be triggered by crafted requests to cause the TMM (Traffic Management Microkernel) to terminate, resulting in denial of service. The exact request format is undisclosed (likely for responsible disclosure).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.1.0, <= 15.1.10>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.5>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2>= 15.1.0, <= 15.1.10>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.5>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2>= 15.1.0, <= 15.1.10>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.5>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2>= 15.1.0, <= 15.1.10>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.5>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2>= 15.1.0, <= 15.1.10>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.5>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2>= 15.1.0, <= 15.1.10>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.5>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2>= 15.1.0, <= 15.1.10>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.5>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2>= 15.1.0, <= 15.1.10>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.5>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show /sys version' or view the version via the BIG-IP Configuration utility under System > Software Management > ISO ImageAffected if version falls within 15.1.0-15.1.10, 16.1.0-16.1.4, or 17.1.0-17.1.1
-
Identify SIP MRF ALG profiles configured on the systemRun 'tmsh list /ltm sip mr-alg-profile all' to list all SIP MRF ALG profiles defined in the configurationAffected if any SIP MRF ALG profile exists in the configuration
-
Identify Message Routing virtual serversRun 'tmsh list /ltm virtual all-properties' and examine the 'type' field for 'message-routing' or inspect the virtual server profile configuration for message routing settingsAffected if any virtual server is configured with Message Routing type
-
Verify if Message Routing virtual servers use SIP MRF ALG profilesFor each Message Routing virtual server identified, run 'tmsh list /ltm virtual <name>' and check the 'profiles' section for sip-mr-alg-profile entryAffected if a Message Routing virtual server has a SIP MRF ALG profile assigned
You are affected if your BIG-IP version is in the affected range AND you have a Message Routing virtual server with a SIP MRF ALG profile configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.1.517.1.2
Apply the vendor patch when available. Until then, consider disabling the SIP MRF ALG profile on Message Routing virtual servers if not required, or implement rate limiting and traffic filtering on upstream devices to reduce attack surface.
Big IP 15.1.11+ (if supported), 16.1.5+, or 17.1.2+ depending on your current major version branch
- 1. Identify the currently installed Big IP version by running 'tmsh show sys version' or checking the web management console.
- 2. Determine which Big IP module (APM, AFM, ASM, etc.) has the SIP MRF ALG profile configured on Message Routing virtual servers.
- 3. For Big IP versions 15.1.x: Upgrade to version 15.1.11 or later.
- 4. For Big IP versions 16.1.x: Upgrade to version 16.1.5 or later.
- 5. For Big IP versions 17.1.x: Upgrade to version 17.1.2 or later.
- 6. After upgrade, verify the SIP MRF ALG profile configuration is functioning correctly.
- 7. Test that TMM no longer terminates upon receiving the previously problematic SIP requests.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-41433 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-41433 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data